Received-SPF: none
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=216.148.227.85; envelope-from=jesse@jessfarr.com
Message-ID: <011101c49b55$ffcdf670$777ba8c0@farrhome>
From: "jesse farr" <jesse@jessfarr.com>
To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
References: <list-411814@logan.com>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Experimental Twin  (was Limp home, etc...)
Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2004 14:58:33 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Now, Bill: I have even been married more than once or twice; I understand a
fellow can change his mind. And, my dear old daddy also told me long ago,
when a fellow figures out he is on a train going the wrong direction, he
needs to get off as soon as he can and catch one going the right way. There
is no question a defiant will take longer, even if it is just one extra
engine job longer. <g> jesse farr

----- Original Message ----- From: "Bill Dube" <bdube@al.noaa.gov>

> >I really am not interested in building a defiant though.  The MkIV will
> >be sufficient.
>
>          If my goal was to build an airplane to fly long distances over
the
> ocean, this is, without a doubt, the ideal airplane. I would jump all over
> this. It is likely that, given the head start, this airplane would be
> faster and much cheaper to build than the Cozy you are clinging to (but
> have not actually started.)
>
>          What gives?