Return-Path: Received: from hermes.fm.intel.com ([192.55.52.18] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.1) with ESMTP id 411734 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Wed, 15 Sep 2004 09:37:35 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=192.55.52.18; envelope-from=randy.smith@intel.com Received: from talaria.fm.intel.com (talaria.fm.intel.com [10.1.192.39]) by hermes.fm.intel.com (8.12.9-20030918-01/8.12.9/d: major-outer.mc,v 1.15 2004/01/30 18:16:28 root Exp $) with ESMTP id i8FDa00S005618 for ; Wed, 15 Sep 2004 13:36:00 GMT Received: from fmsmsxvs041.fm.intel.com (fmsmsxvs041.fm.intel.com [132.233.42.126]) by talaria.fm.intel.com (8.12.9-20030918-01/8.12.9/d: major-inner.mc,v 1.11 2004/07/29 22:51:53 root Exp $) with SMTP id i8FDawG2016517 for ; Wed, 15 Sep 2004 13:37:02 GMT Received: from fmsmsx331.amr.corp.intel.com ([132.233.42.156]) by fmsmsxvs041.fm.intel.com (SAVSMTP 3.1.2.35) with SMTP id M2004091506340508577 for ; Wed, 15 Sep 2004 06:34:05 -0700 Received: from fmsmsx404.amr.corp.intel.com ([132.233.42.208]) by fmsmsx331.amr.corp.intel.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.0); Wed, 15 Sep 2004 06:34:05 -0700 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.7226.0 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: RE: [FlyRotary] Re: Experimental Twin (was Limp home, etc...) Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2004 06:34:04 -0700 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: [FlyRotary] Re: Experimental Twin (was Limp home, etc...) Thread-Index: AcSanik469mZDDwiRFelaCiZycgZcgAiWdyA From: "Smith, Randy" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" X-OriginalArrivalTime: 15 Sep 2004 13:34:05.0182 (UTC) FILETIME=[AB84C9E0:01C49B28] X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.31 (www . roaringpenguin . com / mimedefang) Guys I appreciate all the help and the discussions so far. It is making me think and hopefully it is useful to someone else out there. I now plan to keep the 12A engine and do several series of experiments with it to investigate these things. I'll let the list know what I find out. First I have to get the engine out of the car and on to a test stand... I really am not interested in building a defiant though. The MkIV will be sufficient. At the pace I'm going, I'll take years to get 'er done anyway. -Randy "What's that, another project, SURE, I'll do it..." Smith >-----Original Message----- >From: Rotary motors in aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of >jesse farr >Sent: Tuesday, September 14, 2004 4:57 PM >To: Rotary motors in aircraft >Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Experimental Twin (was Limp home, etc...) > >I know a fellow who has couple of rotary cores sittting in floor waiting on >rebuild; has a partially finished defiant project hanging from hangar >rafters who expects to do just that, if he can ever quit working on >everybody else's airplane to work on his own. If intersted, I can ask him if >he is ready to sell and move onto something else. Just let me know. jesse >farr, soddy tn, just north of chattanooga > >----- Original Message ----- From: "Bill Dube" > >> I figured that the Voyager was not the only one. Apparently, I >> guessed right. >> >> Here is a link for the Defiant: >> >> http://home.online.no/~rrostrup/indexg.htm >> >> Since you haven't actually started to build anything, this would >> meet all your criterion. Put in a pair of rotaries and you have your >> efficient, safe, and inexpensive homebuilt. > > >>> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ >>> Archive: http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html