Mailing List flyrotary@lancaironline.net Message #11437
From: Bulent Aliev <atlasyts@bellsouth.net>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: NACA vs. P51 Scoop
Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2004 08:15:50 -0400
To: Rotary motors in aircraft <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Re: [FlyRotary] Re: NACA vs. P51 Scoop On 9/15/04 6:27 AM, "Joseph M Berki" <Joseph.M.Berki@grc.nasa.gov> wrote:

Hi Randy,
        I am building a rotary powered version of the Long EZ known as the Limo EZ,  I am using the submerged portion of a NACA duct with a modified P51 scoop which makes it look more like a F16 intake.  It should slow the air down and recover pressure. By using the submerged area the cowl can favorably fair into the prop.

Joe Berki
Limo EZAt 07:51 AM 9/14/2004 -0700, Smith, Randy wrote:

This is precisely why I want to decide early on if I should go to the trouble to build the NACA inlet verses the P-51 style scoop.  I m leaning heavily toward the scoop as this is easier to construct and I gain some (although miniscule) room in the fuselage for something else.



-Randy

Hi Randy, I filled the naca scoop and built entirely new P-51 scoop attached to the cowl. For now only looks good. Yet to be seen if it works?

--
Bulent Aliev
Stretched CZ MK-IV W/Turbo Rotary
Ft Lauderdale, FL FXE
http://home.bellsouth.net/p/PWP-MyPlane




Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster