From: Rotary motors in aircraft
[mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net] On
Behalf Of Al Gietzen
Sent: Tuesday, September 14, 2004
2:46 PM
To: Rotary
motors in aircraft
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: NACA vs.
P51 Scoop
I'd say forget the intermittent firing mode. For the
same power it would likely result in just as much,+ or - , as reduced throttle;
and shake the hell out of everything connected to the engine. As I
understand it, the Cadillac mode is an attempt to improve mileage at low load;
maybe 15 - 20% power or less.
Would it
shake? (Why do I feel like a lamb, dumb before the shearer? :-) )
Ok the Cadillac mode attempts to improve mileage. Is 15-20% power
sufficient (or perhaps slightly more with extra oil cooling capacity built in) to
keep flying? I think I just found a use for the 12A engine I have been
given.
If you are going to try to design against coolant loss;
you may just as well try to design against loss of oil, about the same
probability of occurrence.
You have a
point there. Oil gone, I go until the engine seizes. Hopefully I
can ditch near a passing ship or have enough time to radio a mayday or two
(thousand). Same as with a certified engine as well. This needs
more thought.
As far as scoops are
concerned, a NACA scoop may work fine if everything else is right, but will
never have the pressure recovery efficiency of a well designed ram scoop.
More evidence
for the scoop side of the argument.
That'll be 2 cents,
please J
I’ll be
at the Rough River fly-in. See me there. J
Al