Mailing List flyrotary@lancaironline.net Message #11427
From: Al Gietzen <ALVentures@cox.net>
Subject: RE: [FlyRotary] Re: NACA vs. P51 Scoop
Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2004 11:45:35 -0700
To: 'Rotary motors in aircraft' <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>

I'd say forget the intermittent firing mode.  For the same power it would likely result in just as much,+ or - , as reduced throttle; and shake the hell out of everything connected to the engine.  As I understand it, the Cadillac mode is an attempt to improve mileage at low load; maybe 15 - 20% power or less.

 

If you are going to try to design against coolant loss; you may just as well try to design against loss of oil, about the same probability of occurrence.

 

As far as scoops are concerned, a NACA scoop may work fine if everything else is right, but will never have the pressure recovery efficiency of a well designed ram scoop.

 

That'll be 2 cents, please J

 

Al

Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster