Return-Path: Received: from sccrmhc11.comcast.net ([204.127.202.55] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.1) with ESMTP id 410697 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Tue, 14 Sep 2004 14:44:56 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=204.127.202.55; envelope-from=jesse@jessfarr.com Received: from farrhome (pcp04959909pcs.midval01.tn.comcast.net[68.59.199.44]) by comcast.net (sccrmhc11) with SMTP id <20040914184122011009bi1pe>; Tue, 14 Sep 2004 18:41:27 +0000 Message-ID: <023001c49a8a$4f05efd0$777ba8c0@farrhome> From: "jesse farr" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" References: Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: NACA vs. P51 Scoop Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2004 14:40:28 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 I have seen a defiant (?). Isn't that what they call the push/pull canard thing instead of voyager ? jesse farr ----- Original Message ----- From: "Smith, Randy" > If your heart is set on "rolling your own" (including an alternative engine) then perhaps you should build a twin-engine aircraft using a pair of rotaries. Perhaps a scaled-down version of Rutan's Voyager.< Nothing of that sort is in my budget. (nor exists that I know of) :-)