From: Rotary motors in aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net]
On Behalf Of Perry Mick
Sent: Tuesday, September 14, 2004
8:54 AM
To: Rotary
motors in aircraft
Subject: [FlyRotary] NACA vs. P51
Scoop
Dale Rogers wrote:
Randy,
You asked:
1. I am building a Cozy MKIV. It uses an NACA scoop embedded in
the belly to provide cooling air. I am thinking of not building the
NACA scoop as I plan to use some sort of Meredith effect scoop/plenum
(ala the P-51) for cooling. Thoughts?
There are flyers who have successfully used each approach. For example, John Slade gets adaquate cooling
with a NACA scoop; and, the last time I looked, Perry Mick
was using a P-51 style scoop on his Ducted Fan L-EZ.
Dale R.
COZY MkIV-R13BNA #1254
Ch's 4, 5, & 23
I still have the NACA. I have no cooling problems because the ducted
fan assists airflow through the rad. About a year ago I lowered the inlet lip
about 1", increasing inlet area to the rad, and making sort of a scoop out
of the NACA. But it had no effect. My rad cooling is sufficient, but it's
limitation is probably my small rad size and not airflow.
Eventually I will probably grind all that NACA stuff off the belly and use the
original Long-EZ P-51-type scoop. My LEZ fuselage tub was fabricated to the
original design, the NACA was added on later, unlike the Cozy, which I think
has the NACA designed into the fuselage tub.
Perry