Return-Path: Received: from pop3.olsusa.com ([63.150.212.2] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 3.4.5) with ESMTP id 764754 for rob@logan.com; Wed, 25 Apr 2001 19:48:59 -0400 Received: from scaup.mail.pas.earthlink.net ([207.217.121.49]) by pop3.olsusa.com (Post.Office MTA v3.5.3 release 223 ID# 0-71175U5500L550S0V35) with ESMTP id com for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2001 13:33:52 -0400 Received: from progress.com (sdn-ar-006flflauP356.dialsprint.net [158.252.67.180]) by scaup.mail.pas.earthlink.net (EL-8_9_3_3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA01472 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2001 10:40:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <3AE70AD1.C3830329@progress.com> Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2001 13:35:13 -0400 From: Marcelo Pacheco Organization: PROGRESS Software Professional Services MIME-Version: 1.0 To: lancair.list@olsusa.com Subject: Re: running lean of peak Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailing-List: lancair.list@olsusa.com Reply-To: lancair.list@olsusa.com <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> << Lancair Builders' Mail List >> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> Robert, When you lean the engine enough, you have exceess air act as a coolant, as you're getting less air than needed. That's why peak temps are the no-no zone for very high HP aircraft. I never read that fuel is a significant lubricant for the engine. I would expect that partially burned fuel would actually be the inverse of a lubricant. What about the new turbo normalized system IO-550 that Tornado Alley from Ada, OK is producing, which it's recommended operation mode is full throttle, full rich for takeoff and climb, then lean for 15GPH for cruise, then adjust mixture to obtain a certain EGT temp. There are very, very detailed articles on this engine on www.avweb.com, including graphs of engine temps, you can get the engine to produce up to 80% of rated power with very low temps but using WOTLOPSOP (Wide open throttle, Lean of Peak, Standard operating Procedure). Notice the lean for 15GPH thing, this is meant as a quick way to go from rich of peak to lean of peak without leaving the engine close to peak for more than a few seconds, that are is Sorry, I won't take the always run the engine rich of peak argument as a blanket statement. If you had a chance to question the aircraft owner to his specific practices in far more detail than "we was running LOP because he has an engine monitor), then we could get into a more meaningfull conclusion either way. Marcelo Pacheco >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LML website: http://www.olsusa.com/Users/Mkaye/maillist.html LML Builders' Bookstore: http://www.buildersbooks.com/lancair Please send your photos and drawings to marvkaye@olsusa.com. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>