Return-Path: <lancair.list-request@olsusa.com>
Received: from [144.54.3.2] (HELO picker.com)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 3.4.4)
  with ESMTP id 741475 for lancair.list@logan.com; Thu, 12 Apr 2001 15:37:08 -0400
Received: from <lancair.list-request@olsusa.com>
  by picker.com (CommuniGate Pro RULES 3.3b1)
  with RULES id 3845122; Thu, 12 Apr 2001 15:37:06 -0400
X-Autogenerated: Mirror
X-Mirrored-by: <lancair.list-request@olsusa.com>
Received: from [144.54.37.11] (HELO ct.picker.com)
  by picker.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 3.3b1)
  with ESMTP id 3845120 for rob@med.marconi.com; Thu, 12 Apr 2001 15:37:04 -0400
Received: from picker.com (central.picker.com [144.54.3.2])
	by ct.picker.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id PAA21935
	for <rob>; Thu, 12 Apr 2001 15:37:08 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from pop3.olsusa.com ([63.150.212.2] verified)
  by picker.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 3.3b1)
  with ESMTP id 3845119 for rob@ct.picker.com; Thu, 12 Apr 2001 15:37:03 -0400
Received: from chicken.mail.pas.earthlink.net ([207.217.120.114])
          by pop3.olsusa.com (Post.Office MTA v3.5.3 release 223
          ID# 0-71175U5500L550S0V35) with ESMTP id com
          for <lancair.list@olsusa.com>; Thu, 12 Apr 2001 15:30:17 -0400
Received: from eda20p (user32.net064.nj.sprint-hsd.net [207.14.189.32])
	by chicken.mail.pas.earthlink.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id MAA28038
	for <lancair.list@olsusa.com>; Thu, 12 Apr 2001 12:36:15 -0700 (PDT)
From: "Ed McCauley" <ed.mccauley@bltinc.com>
To: <lancair.list@olsusa.com>
Subject: RE: Hysol VS Epoxy?
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2001 15:35:53 -0400
Message-ID: <IJEBKCKHOIKAOAHEEGPKCEHICMAA.ed.mccauley@bltinc.com>
Importance: Normal
In-Reply-To: <012e01c0c2f8$96165da0$d1c395cf@pavilion>
X-Mailing-List: lancair.list@olsusa.com
Reply-To: lancair.list@olsusa.com

          <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
          <<  Lancair Builders' Mail List  >>
          <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>
So, as I understand it, the big difference between the Jeffco system and
Hysol is that the Hysol has better peel strength?  Is that correct?  In that
case, why speced it for the fuel caps?  Just a quirk of the manual?  It
would seem to me that the fuel cap is MORE than held captive by the
bond-material-rivets and the overlying BID lay-ups.  Maybe I ask too many
questions :)

BTW, I did stick an ohm-meter on Hysol and didn't find it to be at all
conductive...  Unlike our carbon skins.  I'm preparing a second batch to
double check my measurements.

Ed McCauley
Milford, NJ
Lancair IV-P -23.493 +/- 30% Complete


>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
LML website:   http://www.olsusa.com/Users/Mkaye/maillist.html
LML Builders' Bookstore:   http://www.buildersbooks.com/lancair

Please send your photos and drawings to marvkaye@olsusa.com.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>