Return-Path: <lancair.list-request@olsusa.com>
Received: from [144.54.3.2] (HELO picker.com)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 3.4.4)
  with ESMTP id 741205 for lancair.list@logan.com; Thu, 12 Apr 2001 04:56:50 -0400
Received: from <lancair.list-request@olsusa.com>
  by picker.com (CommuniGate Pro RULES 3.3b1)
  with RULES id 3820687; Thu, 12 Apr 2001 04:56:45 -0400
X-Autogenerated: Mirror
X-Mirrored-by: <lancair.list-request@olsusa.com>
Received: from [144.54.37.11] (HELO ct.picker.com)
  by picker.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 3.3b1)
  with ESMTP id 3820685 for rob@med.marconi.com; Thu, 12 Apr 2001 04:56:44 -0400
Received: from picker.com (central.picker.com [144.54.3.2])
	by ct.picker.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id EAA07287
	for <rob>; Thu, 12 Apr 2001 04:56:50 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from pop3.olsusa.com ([63.150.212.2] verified)
  by picker.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 3.3b1)
  with ESMTP id 3820684 for rob@ct.picker.com; Thu, 12 Apr 2001 04:56:42 -0400
Received: from olympus.net ([198.133.237.6]) by pop3.olsusa.com
          (Post.Office MTA v3.5.3 release 223 ID# 0-71175U5500L550S0V35)
          with ESMTP id com for <lancair.list@olsusa.com>;
          Wed, 11 Apr 2001 22:24:52 -0400
Received: from pt195209.olympus.net ([207.149.195.209] helo=pavilion)
	by olympus.net with smtp (Exim 3.12 #1)
	id 14nWsi-0005GV-00
	for lancair.list@olsusa.com; Wed, 11 Apr 2001 19:30:48 -0700
Message-ID: <012e01c0c2f8$96165da0$d1c395cf@pavilion>
From: "John Barrett" <2thman@olympus.net>
To: "Lancair Mail List" <lancair.list@olsusa.com>
Subject: Re: Hysol VS Epoxy?
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2001 18:59:55 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailing-List: lancair.list@olsusa.com
Reply-To: lancair.list@olsusa.com

          <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
          <<  Lancair Builders' Mail List  >>
          <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>
Gary,

 you're obviously correct about Hysol being the name of the company - not
the product, but since Lancair sells and recommends Hysol 9339, that's
usually understood, although not technically correct (complete)..

There are numerous hi peel strength adhesives made by Hysol and others.  The
ones made for aerospace - like 9339 - are made to stricter properties than
the non aerospace and they all start (if I recall) with the numeral 9 in
their designation.  There are some others for the marine market and general
markets that have similar properties as well.  I have tried some sample
alternatives from Hysol and have been very impressed with the results.  All
were aerospace so no savings was contemplated, but I think with testing,
you'd find that the lower cost ones would be just as good, if the peel
strengths are the same.

Regards,
John

From: "Gary Rodgers" <grodgers@epix.net>
To: <lancair.list@olsusa.com>
Subject: RE: Hysol VS Epoxy?

Have a look at the above site.  Hysol is a trade name and not a specific
product.  The product line of Hysol includes epoxies.

Gary

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
LML website:   http://www.olsusa.com/Users/Mkaye/maillist.html
LML Builders' Bookstore:   http://www.buildersbooks.com/lancair

Please send your photos and drawings to marvkaye@olsusa.com.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>