Return-Path: <lancair.list-request@olsusa.com>
Received: from [144.54.3.2] (HELO picker.com)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 3.4.4)
  with ESMTP id 740546 for lancair.list@logan.com; Wed, 11 Apr 2001 02:42:53 -0400
Received: from <lancair.list-request@olsusa.com>
  by picker.com (CommuniGate Pro RULES 3.3b1)
  with RULES id 3772472; Wed, 11 Apr 2001 02:42:50 -0400
X-Autogenerated: Mirror
X-Mirrored-by: <lancair.list-request@olsusa.com>
Received: from [144.54.37.11] (HELO ct.picker.com)
  by picker.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 3.3b1)
  with ESMTP id 3772471 for rob@med.marconi.com; Wed, 11 Apr 2001 02:42:49 -0400
Received: from picker.com (central.picker.com [144.54.3.2])
	by ct.picker.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id CAA09024
	for <rob>; Wed, 11 Apr 2001 02:42:54 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from pop3.olsusa.com ([63.150.212.2] verified)
  by picker.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 3.3b1)
  with ESMTP id 3772470 for rob@ct.picker.com; Wed, 11 Apr 2001 02:42:47 -0400
Received: from smtp4.gateway.net ([208.230.117.248]) by pop3.olsusa.com
          (Post.Office MTA v3.5.3 release 223 ID# 0-71175U5500L550S0V35)
          with ESMTP id com for <lancair.list@olsusa.com>;
          Wed, 11 Apr 2001 02:36:38 -0400
Received: from f3g6s4 (1Cust10.tnt1.coeur-dalene.id.da.uu.net [63.27.107.10])
	by smtp4.gateway.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id CAA01874
	for <lancair.list@olsusa.com>; Wed, 11 Apr 2001 02:42:32 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <001901c0c252$e5b93180$0a6b1b3f@f3g6s4>
Reply-To: "dfs" <dfs@gateway.net>
Reply-To: lancair.list@olsusa.com
From: "dfs" <dfs@gateway.net>
To: "Lancair list" <lancair.list@olsusa.com>
Subject: Saving a few bucks
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2001 23:44:44 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailing-List: lancair.list@olsusa.com

          <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
          <<  Lancair Builders' Mail List  >>
          <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>
To Greg Nelson re: swapping dynafocal mounting rubbers around.

I have occasionally seen this done by mechanics on certificated airplanes to
cure unsightly spinner to cowl alignment. I was told that depending on the
condition of the bond of the rubber to the metal plate (no delamination) and
condition of the rubber itself (no cracks in the pucks that will be in
tension) there should be no problem. Seems it's a common practice for some
FBO's doing engine work.

The only drawback I can see (the above caveats being met) is if the rubber
has become hardened with age and heat. Then, you may not get the vibration
damping new rubber will afford. Can't say whether this is a problem or not
since that will be the case even before moving them around.

Dan Schaefer


>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
LML website:   http://www.olsusa.com/Users/Mkaye/maillist.html
LML Builders' Bookstore:   http://www.buildersbooks.com/lancair

Please send your photos and drawings to marvkaye@olsusa.com.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>