Return-Path: Received: from [144.54.3.2] (HELO picker.com) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 3.4.3) with ESMTP id 735759 for lancair.list@logan.com; Mon, 09 Apr 2001 08:41:21 -0400 Received: from by picker.com (CommuniGate Pro RULES 3.3b1) with RULES id 3689110; Mon, 09 Apr 2001 08:41:19 -0400 X-Autogenerated: Mirror X-Mirrored-by: Received: from [144.54.37.11] (HELO ct.picker.com) by picker.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 3.3b1) with ESMTP id 3688766 for rob@med.marconi.com; Mon, 09 Apr 2001 08:41:17 -0400 Received: from picker.com (central.picker.com [144.54.3.2]) by ct.picker.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id IAA21429 for ; Mon, 9 Apr 2001 08:41:20 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pop3.olsusa.com ([63.150.212.2] verified) by picker.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 3.3b1) with ESMTP id 3689106 for rob@ct.picker.com; Mon, 09 Apr 2001 08:41:13 -0400 Received: from smtp01.mrf.mail.rcn.net ([207.172.4.60]) by pop3.olsusa.com (Post.Office MTA v3.5.3 release 223 ID# 0-71175U5500L550S0V35) with ESMTP id com for ; Mon, 9 Apr 2001 08:13:12 -0400 Received: from 207-172-110-129.s129.tnt1.frd.va.dialup.rcn.com ([207.172.110.129] helo=oemcomputer) by smtp01.mrf.mail.rcn.net with smtp (Exim 3.16 #5) id 14madL-0003mu-00 for lancair.list@olsusa.com; Mon, 09 Apr 2001 08:19:03 -0400 Message-ID: <004801c0c0ef$82f9ce60$816eaccf@oemcomputer> From: "Bill & Sue" To: References: <20010409044859.AAA7095@pop3.olsusa.com> Subject: LNC2 C of G limits Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2001 08:20:48 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailing-List: lancair.list@olsusa.com Reply-To: lancair.list@olsusa.com <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> << Lancair Builders' Mail List >> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > Yeah, but now back to the original question by Ian, "Where is 11 to 29% > of MAC? No one has answered that specific question yet and he and I > would both benefit from an answer. Greg Nelson ........................................................... Ian, the CG range is expressed in distance from (your) datum. Only if you use the aft face of the firewall as your datum will the CG range be in FS numbers. I used the aft face of the firewall for mine for the following reasons: 1. The arms of the various stations are the same as the FS. 2. It's easier to measure stuff inside the airplane from the aft face of the firewall. 3. It keeps the numbers a little smaller. 4. It's a fixed point that doesn't move on a particular airplane or between airplanes. The only possible disadvantages I could come up with (and they are pretty minor) are: 1. In your initial W&B calculations the nosewheel moment is negative. 2. Oil moment is negative. (to solve this one, I computed a basic operating weight and CG that includes oil) By the way, here's what I measured as arms for various items: Empty AC 22.46 (mine, yours will be different for sure) Oil -24 (depends on engine and mount) Header tank 7.1 (should be fairly close on all planes) Wing tanks 37.8 (should be the same on all planes) Seats 43.0 (should be close) Baggage 1 63.0 (should be close if you seperate the Baggage 2 82.0 areas, otherwise use 72.5) Aft shelf 100.0 (should be close) I separated the baggage compartment into two areas just like Cessna does on the C150. The arms for the fuel and seats were calculated from adding weight (fuel, humans) and noting the change in CG on the scales and verified as reasonable with a tape. Hope that this helps, Bill Harrelson harrelson@erols.com N5ZQ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LML website: http://www.olsusa.com/Users/Mkaye/maillist.html LML Builders' Bookstore: http://www.buildersbooks.com/lancair Please send your photos and drawings to marvkaye@olsusa.com. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>