Return-Path: Received: from postoffice.mr.net ([137.192.180.7]) by truman.olsusa.com (Post.Office MTA v3.1.2 release (PO203-101c) ID# 0-44819U2500L250S0) with ESMTP id AAA27673 for ; Thu, 22 Oct 1998 23:49:25 -0400 Received: by postoffice.mr.net (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id WAA27831 at Thu, 22 Oct 1998 22:49:33 -0500 (CDT) SMTP "HELO" = mr.net But _really_ from upp12-162.nas.mr.net [137.192.67.162] SMTP "MAIL FROM" = msmith1@mr.net SMTP "RCPT TO" = Message-ID: <362FFB82.CB1FE511@mr.net> Date: Thu, 22 Oct 1998 22:44:02 -0500 From: Michael D Smith To: "lancair.list@olsusa.com" Subject: Winglets X-Mailing-List: lancair.list@olsusa.com Mime-Version: 1.0 <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> << Lancair Builders' Mail List >> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> Do the winglets really make that big of a difference? I have heard that there is less yaw, improved climb, and high altitude performance. has anyone verified that? I have regular wing tips, and the factory wont take them in on credit for winglets. i bought the kit partially completed, so that decision was out of my hands at the time. As the building process goes on, I at least sometimes have a hard time keeping focused on simply getting the plane done and flying, but I think the decision to shell out $2000 for wing tips requires this forum expert opinion on the valid issues at hand. I really appreciate this resource. Michael D Smith