Return-Path: Received: from wren.prod.itd.earthlink.net ([207.217.121.64]) by ns1.olsusa.com (Post.Office MTA v3.5.3 release 223 ID# 0-71175U5500L550S0V35) with ESMTP id com for ; Fri, 23 Mar 2001 07:52:34 -0500 Received: from eda20p (nwf-nj25-01.ix.netcom.com [198.211.22.1]) by wren.prod.itd.earthlink.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id FAA22259 for ; Fri, 23 Mar 2001 05:01:39 -0800 (PST) From: "Ed McCauley" To: Subject: IV - Fuel configuration Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2001 08:01:13 -0500 Message-ID: Importance: Normal X-Mailing-List: lancair.list@olsusa.com Reply-To: lancair.list@olsusa.com Mime-Version: 1.0 <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> << Lancair Builders' Mail List >> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> Hi all, I'm approaching the final decision point regarding my wing fuel configuration on my IV-P (Note: I'll be installing the winglets). Within the limits of reason and safety, I'd like to get as much as possible in the wings. I have two questions: 1. The wing is so narrow at its outboard ends. Have any of you experienced difficulty in fueling? I plan to install a 'bash plate' to protect the lower wing from, shall we say, overly aggressive insertion BUT with such a limited depth of insertion, does the nozzle tend to kick off or have the fuel spray reflect off the inner/lower skin? (I tried my best to limit the innuendo here!) 2. The manual says that the installation of an additional rib at BL165 is the only supported extension of fuel towards the wingtip. I'd like to go all the way to BL171 though. Do any of you see problems with this? FYI, I've identified and can live with two issues that effect question #2: a. Because they're a bit too short, I know there'll be an issues with the capacitive fuel probes (I have the extended ones) indicating empty when I still have gas in the inboard bays. b. The issue of locating the pitot tube is one that I'll need to deal with. and FYI: I. I'm making the leading edge dry and running my electrics through the space. Here I'm losing a bit of fuel but, I feel, getting a better, safer, more robust and reliable end result. II. I'm also planning on using the bays that the aileron goes through for gas. I'll be installing an eglass tube for the pushrod to pass through. Using this approach, my only dry bay will be the one containing the aileron bell crank and speed break. So, any words of wisdom from the learned ones? Ed McCauley Milford, NJ Lancair IV-P -23.493 +/- 30% Complete >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LML website: http://www.olsusa.com/Users/Mkaye/maillist.html LML Builders' Bookstore: http://www.buildersbooks.com/lancair Please send your photos and drawings to marvkaye@olsusa.com. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>