Return-Path: Received: from albatross.prod.itd.earthlink.net ([207.217.120.120]) by ns1.olsusa.com (Post.Office MTA v3.5.3 release 223 ID# 0-70783U4500L450S0V35) with ESMTP id com for ; Wed, 14 Mar 2001 20:01:57 -0500 Received: from jenny (pool-63.53.23.72.ipls.grid.net [63.53.23.72]) by albatross.prod.itd.earthlink.net (EL-8_9_3_3/8.9.3) with SMTP id RAA25325 for ; Wed, 14 Mar 2001 17:10:54 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <003501c0acbe$f04102d0$4817353f@jenny> From: "Joe Trepicone" To: Subject: winglet fuel vent size Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2001 19:42:42 -0000 X-Mailing-List: lancair.list@olsusa.com Reply-To: lancair.list@olsusa.com Mime-Version: 1.0 <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> << Lancair Builders' Mail List >> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> This question pertains to the aluminum tubing located in the winglets used to vent the fuel bays. As most of us who have worked with the winglets are aware the manual calls for 1/4" tubing. I understand that several building are utilizing 3/8" instead and that Mark at Lancair is, in fact, recommends it. It's easy to see the logic in the larger tube size. In aconversation yesterday with Don at Lancair he suggested not using the 3/8" because of the greater possibility of moisture entering the tube and also said 1/4" worked fine for him for many years. I am curious what most builders have used, are using and would use if they could do it over again. thanks for the help Joe Trepicone (IVP) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LML website: http://www.olsusa.com/Users/Mkaye/maillist.html LML Builders' Bookstore: http://www.buildersbooks.com/lancair Please send your photos and drawings to marvkaye@olsusa.com. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>