Return-Path: Received: from scaup.prod.itd.earthlink.net ([207.217.121.49]) by ns1.olsusa.com (Post.Office MTA v3.5.3 release 223 ID# 0-70783U4500L450S0V35) with ESMTP id com for ; Sat, 10 Feb 2001 19:38:52 -0500 Received: from computername (dialup-64.152.162.73.NewYork1.Level3.net [64.152.162.73]) by scaup.prod.itd.earthlink.net (EL-8_9_3_3/8.9.3) with SMTP id QAA19481 for ; Sat, 10 Feb 2001 16:46:10 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <000801c093c4$4e83afa0$49a29840@computername> From: "Skip Slater" To: Subject: Brent's comments on nylaflow Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2001 16:48:08 -0800 X-Mailing-List: lancair.list@olsusa.com Reply-To: lancair.list@olsusa.com Mime-Version: 1.0 <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> << Lancair Builders' Mail List >> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> Brent, There's been a lot of discussion about nylaflow brake lines on the360 and IV's. My ES won't have retractable gear with the chafing threat in the pivots. Nor will it have lines exposed to the airstream, as they run inside the strut fairings. The nylaflow lines also don't run between the fuselage and the brakes, just in some places inside the fuselage. Do you still think they pose a potential problem in the ES? If so, where would you most recomend putting the higher pressure lines? Skip Slater >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LML website: http://www.olsusa.com/Users/Mkaye/maillist.html LML Builders' Bookstore: http://www.buildersbooks.com/lancair Please send your photos and drawings to marvkaye@olsusa.com. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>