Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.gateway.net ([208.230.117.245]) by ns1.olsusa.com (Post.Office MTA v3.5.3 release 223 ID# 0-70783U4500L450S0V35) with ESMTP id com for ; Tue, 6 Feb 2001 04:33:09 -0500 Received: from f3g6s4 (1Cust176.tnt1.coeur-dalene.id.da.uu.net [63.27.107.176]) by smtp1.gateway.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id EAA25303 for ; Tue, 6 Feb 2001 04:41:43 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <000b01c09021$9953cb60$b06b1b3f@f3g6s4> Reply-To: "dfs" Reply-To: lancair.list@olsusa.com From: "dfs" To: "Lancair list" Subject: Re: Lancair 235/320 Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2001 01:45:52 -0800 X-Mailing-List: lancair.list@olsusa.com Mime-Version: 1.0 <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> << Lancair Builders' Mail List >> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> My thanks to Greg Nelson for his vote of confidence - but, unfortunately - I can't answer the question regarding whether the later wings will fit an early 235 airframe. Someone who might though is Jim Wapelhorst or Dennis Conkey, who have their 235/320 down at Camarillo, CA. Jim tried to take some airport lights with him on a takeoff back in '93 or '94 and his Lancair came out second best. I was a hangar mate of Jim and Dennis then and, if memory serves, they had to rebuild using 320 outer wing panels as the earlier ones weren't available. (I could be wrong on this, as I say, I'm relying on my memory - and we all know that that's the second thing to go as you get older [don't even ask what's the first!]). I know they both read the LML so maybe Jim or Dennis has the answer. My guess that where there's a will, there's a way. Might just take a bit of mechanic-ing, i.e., get a big hammer. Dan Schaefer >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LML website: http://www.olsusa.com/Users/Mkaye/maillist.html LML Builders' Bookstore: http://www.buildersbooks.com/lancair Please send your photos and drawings to marvkaye@olsusa.com. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>