Return-Path: Received: from hawk.prod.itd.earthlink.net ([207.217.120.22]) by ns1.olsusa.com (Post.Office MTA v3.5.3 release 223 ID# 0-64832U3500L350S0V35) with ESMTP id com for ; Tue, 16 Jan 2001 23:09:56 -0500 Received: from computer (pool0790.cvx35-bradley.dialup.earthlink.net [216.244.15.25]) by hawk.prod.itd.earthlink.net (EL-8_9_3_3/8.9.3) with SMTP id UAA13136 for ; Tue, 16 Jan 2001 20:18:17 -0800 (PST) From: "Skip Slater" To: Subject: RE: Going slow in the ES Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2001 20:17:31 -0800 Message-ID: Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: <4f.62689ac.27954b47@aol.com> X-Mailing-List: lancair.list@olsusa.com Reply-To: lancair.list@olsusa.com Mime-Version: 1.0 <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> << Lancair Builders' Mail List >> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> John, If you've seen the ES and IV flaps side by side, you know that the difference in size is enormous. I don't think there's any way the IV mechanism would be adaptable to the ES. Add to that the fact that the IV uses a hydraulically actuated push rod versus the ES's electrically actuated torque tube and the problem becomes even more complex. This sounds like a mod I wouldn't think is doable absent a complete redesign and I really doubt you'd gain enough to make it worthwhile. Skip Slater >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LML website: http://www.olsusa.com/Users/Mkaye/maillist.html LML Builders' Bookstore: http://www.buildersbooks.com/lancair Please send your photos and drawings to marvkaye@olsusa.com. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>