Return-Path: Received: from hotmail.com ([64.4.14.198]) by ns1.olsusa.com (Post.Office MTA v3.5.3 release 223 ID# 0-64832U3500L350S0V35) with ESMTP id com for ; Tue, 16 Jan 2001 21:28:48 -0500 Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Tue, 16 Jan 2001 18:36:48 -0800 From: "Marc Verdi" To: , References: <3A64E98E.DA909895@ieee.org> Subject: Re: Wet compass deflection Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2001 21:36:36 -0500 Message-ID: X-Mailing-List: lancair.list@olsusa.com Reply-To: lancair.list@olsusa.com Mime-Version: 1.0 <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> << Lancair Builders' Mail List >> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> Guys: If the magnetic interference is emanating from the panel (which may not be the only source, e.g. firewall-forward RF sources).... why not place the shielding between the panel and wet compass? Sort of a Mu-dash panel..... Wouldn't that solve some of the issue (assuming that the majority of "power on" interference emanates from the panel)? Or perhaps the combination of panel mu shield and compass mu shield? Just brainstorming. -Marc >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LML website: http://www.olsusa.com/Users/Mkaye/maillist.html LML Builders' Bookstore: http://www.buildersbooks.com/lancair Please send your photos and drawings to marvkaye@olsusa.com. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>