Return-Path: Received: from mail1.pe.net ([64.38.64.6]) by ns1.olsusa.com (Post.Office MTA v3.5.3 release 223 ID# 0-64832U3500L350S0V35) with ESMTP id com for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2001 13:20:10 -0500 Received: from ieee.org (IP-87-221.tem.pe.net [64.38.87.221]) by mail1.pe.net (8.9.3/8.9.1) with ESMTP id KAA24813 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2001 10:28:26 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <3A5B5841.E1FD68FA@ieee.org> Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2001 10:28:17 -0800 From: "Charles R. Patton" Reply-To: charles.r.patton@ieee.org Reply-To: lancair.list@olsusa.com To: lancair.list@olsusa.com Subject: re alternators and high altitude brushes References: <3A5B3276.688D772@burgoyne.com> X-Mailing-List: lancair.list@olsusa.com Mime-Version: 1.0 <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> << Lancair Builders' Mail List >> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> I feel like I picked up the proverbial feather with molasses on it – now I’m stuck. On Jan 1, 2001 I offered an observation about voltage breakdown-down (re Paschen’s law) and a conjecture about carbon lubricity at high altitude. There ensued several questions of which a couple were directed to me. Bob Smiley asked, “In plain language, are you saying we do not need to worry about electrical arcs in auto-mitsubishi alternators below 18,000 MSL?” Later Greg Nelson asked, “Just how quickly (in operating hours) might an alternator fail if it is operated at thin atmosphere for perhaps 30% of all engine time?" and, "Will the failure be gradual or sudden?" But to me it seemed the root question was to understand “the dusting” and “harder” brushes. I tackled the question by going to a brush manufacturer and asking about brushes used in aviation service. Here are the salient points. 1) My conjecture about lubricity is the crux of the matter. At high altitudes, simple carbon brushes do not adsorb enough moisture to form a lubricating layer. 2) This effect starts at relatively low altitudes (in my opinion) since they have found the need to use special brushes on ski-lifts and in some desert conditions to counteract this moisture deficit. This was the area of surprise to me. I just didn’t expect it to start at such low altitudes. 3) The “high-altitude” brushes are not harder, but are specially formulated to retain lubricity in high-altitude, low moisture conditions. Typical additives in the brush are barium fluoride and molybdenum disulphide. 4) Much of the development was done during WWII. 5) I asked in particular about the “dusting” and whether it also wears down the slip ring. The first answer is, “No, it doesn’t wear the slip ring.” But the follow-on corollary is that when the carbon looses it lubricity it tends to chatter, then the arcing that follows pits the slip ring (leading to arc erosion.) 6) I asked how to specify brushes for high-altitude. The answer was some manufacturers do not formulate high-altitude brushes and those that do have no standard grade nomenclature. So you just have to ask for “high-altitude” brushes. From the sales rep I also ran into the comments about STCs etc. If you just ask for high-altitude brushes, on an as-is, where-is basis though, there probably would not be a problem getting them. So from the above, plus others comments in this thread, I would have no reservations about using an automotive alternator providing the brushes are changed out to high-altitude brushes. If you get into it, probably some de-rating would be necessary due to lower cooling capacity of lower density air at high altitudes. There are standard formulas and textbooks on subject. Automotive alternators typically go many hundreds of hours with no problem whatsoever in very dusty conditions. As an anecdotal note, I have a Toyota Camray with 145K miles on it, and I have never had to touch the alternator. That’s almost 3K hours based on 50 mph average (which I may get as I do a lot of highway driving with part of it over a very dusty road to our house.) So it seems there is nothing inherently wrong with their design other than this brush problem at high-altitude. If an automotive alternator could be standardized on, probably a group buy of brushes could be made which would be financially advantageous for all if they have to be custom made. (I am not volunteering for this as my plane is already built, but if someone wants to step up, I’ll give them a potential source to call for a brush fabricator.) (Maybe I can that feather off my hand now!) Regards, Charles R. Patton N360JM >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LML website: http://www.olsusa.com/Users/Mkaye/maillist.html LML Builders' Bookstore: http://www.buildersbooks.com/lancair Please send your photos and drawings to marvkaye@olsusa.com. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>