Return-Path: Received: from btc1.up.net ([205.242.56.10]) by ns1.olsusa.com (Post.Office MTA v3.5.3 release 223 ID# 0-64832U3500L350S0V35) with ESMTP id com for ; Fri, 10 Nov 2000 08:23:04 -0500 Received: from imt00064 (imt1-pm2-68.dial.up.net [208.16.251.68]) by btc1.up.net (8.11.0/8.11.0) with SMTP id eAADUcQ21767 for ; Fri, 10 Nov 2000 08:30:38 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <002001c04b2b$d1189520$44fb10d0@imt00064> From: "beth" To: "lancair mail list" Subject: micro vs superfil Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2000 07:34:33 -0800 X-Mailing-List: lancair.list@olsusa.com Reply-To: lancair.list@olsusa.com Mime-Version: 1.0 <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> << Lancair Builders' Mail List >> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> I have used both the micro and superfil options and attended the informational class put on by the PolyFiber folks(superfil). I am a little skeptical about the weight reduction claims made by superfil but do believe it is a little lighter. I still use micro in any locations that would be impact stress areas, i.e.; leading edges. What I would say, a great benefit of superfil is the consistency of the material density. Micro will not meet this consistency and when sanded will have a tendency to be tougher to get a desired perfect fill. The superfil with the more precise filler to "epoxy" ratio will sand more evenly. When doing final finish work, and sanding across multiple applications of filler, I have found a better result with the superfil. Tom Sullivan The Yuper ( U.P. of Michigan) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LML website: http://www.olsusa.com/Users/Mkaye/maillist.html LML Builders' Bookstore: http://www.buildersbooks.com/lancair Please send your photos and drawings to marvkaye@olsusa.com. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>