Return-Path: Received: from imo-r05.mail.aol.com ([152.163.225.5]) by ns1.olsusa.com (Post.Office MTA v3.5.3 release 223 ID# 0-64832U3500L350S0V35) with ESMTP id com for ; Fri, 10 Nov 2000 02:34:31 -0500 Received: from RWolf99@aol.com by imo-r05.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v28.32.) id k.7e.cbb27c3 (3888) for ; Fri, 10 Nov 2000 02:41:57 -0500 (EST) From: RWolf99@aol.com Message-ID: <7e.cbb27c3.273d00c5@aol.com> Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2000 02:41:57 EST Subject: Re: Micro vs Superfil To: lancair.list@olsusa.com X-Mailing-List: lancair.list@olsusa.com Reply-To: lancair.list@olsusa.com Mime-Version: 1.0 <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> << Lancair Builders' Mail List >> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> Superfil is lighter (3.5 pounds per gallon vs 6 pounds per gallon for epoxy/micro) and easier to sand (not that micro is hard to sand). I'm using that wherever I can. They caution you not to use it too thick, however. They say not to go thicker than 1/4 inch unless you put a layer of BID over it for strength. I experimented with it on the bottom of the fuselage where the belly pan attaches to the tailcone. I figured if it came out crappy nobody would notice. It actually came out very well. - Rob Wolf >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LML website: http://www.olsusa.com/Users/Mkaye/maillist.html LML Builders' Bookstore: http://www.buildersbooks.com/lancair Please send your photos and drawings to marvkaye@olsusa.com. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>