Return-Path: Received: from spknpop1.spkn.uswest.net ([207.108.48.1]) by ns1.olsusa.com (Post.Office MTA v3.5.3 release 223 ID# 0-64832U3500L350S0V35) with SMTP id com for ; Thu, 9 Nov 2000 22:52:56 -0500 Received: (qmail 10587 invoked by alias); 10 Nov 2000 04:00:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 10545 invoked by uid 0); 10 Nov 2000 04:00:28 -0000 Received: from spkndslgw3poola188.spkn.uswest.net (HELO qwest.net) (63.227.96.188) by spknpop1.spkn.uswest.net with SMTP; 10 Nov 2000 04:00:28 -0000 Delivered-To: fixup-lancair.list@olsusa.com@fixme Message-ID: <3A0B7253.D8707496@qwest.net> Date: Thu, 09 Nov 2000 19:58:11 -0800 From: Curtis Krouse To: lancair.list@olsusa.com Subject: Re: micro vs. superfil References: <3A0B62C6.54AB8DF4@netwalk.com> X-Mailing-List: lancair.list@olsusa.com Reply-To: lancair.list@olsusa.com Mime-Version: 1.0 <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> << Lancair Builders' Mail List >> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> Joe, I'd stick with micro since it comes in the kit. It's very easy to work with, and as long as you wear a breather, inhalation isn't an issue. And speaking of breathers....you're going to want to wear one no matter what you choose to use because you can't be too careful about what you breathe. I find micro very easy to work with. Curtis Krouse N753K Joe Trep wrote: > I'm debating using superfil instead of micro (micro & epoxy). A couple > builders suggested this. I think their reasoning was that it was lighter, > easier to work with, safer (no glass bubbles in inhale). From what I've >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LML website: http://www.olsusa.com/Users/Mkaye/maillist.html LML Builders' Bookstore: http://www.buildersbooks.com/lancair Please send your photos and drawings to marvkaye@olsusa.com. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>