Return-Path: Received: from nw1.netwalk.net ([216.69.192.11]) by ns1.olsusa.com (Post.Office MTA v3.5.3 release 223 ID# 0-64832U3500L350S0V35) with ESMTP id com for ; Thu, 9 Nov 2000 21:44:55 -0500 Received: from netwalk.com (tcs6-73.wblt.netwalk.net [216.69.202.201]) by nw1.netwalk.net (8.9.2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id VAA31460 for ; Thu, 9 Nov 2000 21:52:27 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <3A0B62C6.54AB8DF4@netwalk.com> Date: Thu, 09 Nov 2000 21:51:50 -0500 From: Joe Trep To: lancair.list@olsusa.com Subject: micro vs. superfil X-Mailing-List: lancair.list@olsusa.com Reply-To: lancair.list@olsusa.com Mime-Version: 1.0 <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> << Lancair Builders' Mail List >> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> I'm debating using superfil instead of micro (micro & epoxy). A couple builders suggested this. I think their reasoning was that it was lighter, easier to work with, safer (no glass bubbles in inhale). From what I've seen cost isn't one of the reasons. What do some of you experienced builders think? Any thoughts would be appreciated. Joe Trepicone, IV-P >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LML website: http://www.olsusa.com/Users/Mkaye/maillist.html LML Builders' Bookstore: http://www.buildersbooks.com/lancair Please send your photos and drawings to marvkaye@olsusa.com. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>