X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2014 13:21:48 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from pt-smtp-02.commander.net.au ([218.214.227.99] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 6.0.9e) with SMTP id 7099396 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sat, 16 Aug 2014 09:03:58 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=218.214.227.99; envelope-from=stevens5@swiftdsl.com.au Received: (qmail 13338 invoked from network); 16 Aug 2014 13:03:21 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO StevensPC) (218.215.200.122) by pt-smtp-02.commander.net.au with SMTP; 16 Aug 2014 13:03:21 -0000 From: "Stevens Family" X-Original-To: "'Lancair Mailing List'" References: In-Reply-To: Subject: RE: [LML] Re: L360 static ports X-Original-Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2014 21:03:39 +0800 X-Original-Message-ID: <000601cfb952$7fb021e0$7f1065a0$@swiftdsl.com.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0007_01CFB995.8DD5D2E0" X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0 Thread-Index: AQIB9+mDK3UE/JJ3gjMXEqy8+T+jl5tutK5A Content-Language: en-au This is a multipart message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0007_01CFB995.8DD5D2E0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Thanks Dave. It=E2=80=99s because I don=E2=80=99t want a big box down = both sides of the baggage area that I asked the question. =20 Thanks for responding. =20 Rob. =20 =20 From: Lancair Mailing List [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of = David Powell Sent: Friday, 15 August 2014 9:02 PM To: Lancair Mailing List Subject: [LML] Re: L360 static ports =20 In the 360 that I purchased, I believe the builder put some kind of = protective box (wood by the feel of it) around the sensitive areas. = I=E2=80=99m not certain, but it appears he also ran some other lines or = wires through the area because the boxed areas seem bigger than = necessary for just the static system. =20 Hope that helps, Dave =20 =20 From: Stevens Family =20 Sent: Friday, August 15, 2014 4:09 AM To: Lancair Mailing List =20 Subject: [LML] L360 static ports =20 A question for those who have gone before me. I am just getting to the = stage of planning my static system. I plan on putting in two static = ports, one on either side of the fuselage, as suggested in the manual. = The recommended position is about half way along the sides of the = baggage area. They suggest using a Nylon Nylo-seal 268N fitting bonded = into the honeycomb of the side panel. This would protrude what looks to = be about an inch into the baggage area. The Nylo-seal tubing then = attaches to the fitting, which will result in the whole connection = protruding at least 2=E2=80=9D into the baggage area. =20 Whilst I am sure this will work well as far as the static system is = concerned, it seems to me that it will only be a matter of time before = an errant piece of baggage being placed into the baggage area will land = on the protruding tubing and damage and/or break the nylo-seal fitting. =20 What have others done about this? I thought of using a Nylo-seal 269N = elbow fitting, but it is not clear (at least to me!) from the = specifications that this will work. =20 I am interested in what others have done. =20 Thanks for help. =20 Regards, =20 Rob Stevens Perth, Western Australia. =20 =20 ------=_NextPart_000_0007_01CFB995.8DD5D2E0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Thanks Dave. It=E2=80=99s because I = don=E2=80=99t want a big box down both sides of the baggage area that I = asked the question.

Thanks for = responding.

Rob.

From: Lancair Mailing List [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net] = On Behalf Of David Powell
Sent: Friday, 15 August 2014 = 9:02 PM
To: Lancair Mailing List
Subject: [LML] Re: = L360 static ports

In the = 360 that I purchased, I believe the builder put some kind of protective = box (wood by the feel of it) around the sensitive areas. I=E2=80=99m not = certain, but it appears he also ran some other lines or wires through = the area because the boxed areas seem bigger than necessary for just the = static system.

Hope = that helps,

Dave

From: Stevens Family =

Sent: Friday, August 15, 2014 4:09 = AM

To: Lancair Mailing List =

Subject: [LML] L360 static = ports

<= o:p>

A question for those who have gone before me. I am = just getting to the stage of planning my static system. I plan on = putting in two static ports, one on either side of the fuselage, as = suggested in the manual. The recommended position is about half = way along the sides of the baggage area. They suggest using a = Nylon Nylo-seal 268N fitting bonded into the honeycomb of the side = panel. This would protrude what looks to be about an inch into the = baggage area. The Nylo-seal tubing then attaches to the fitting, which = will result in the whole connection protruding at least 2=E2=80=9D into = the baggage area.

Whilst I am sure this will = work well as far as the static system is concerned, it seems to me that = it will only be a matter of time before an errant piece of baggage being = placed into the baggage area will land on the protruding tubing and = damage and/or break the nylo-seal fitting.

What have others done = about this? I thought of using a Nylo-seal 269N elbow fitting, but it is = not clear (at least to me!) from the specifications that this will = work.

I am interested in what = others have done.

Thanks for = help.

Regards,

Rob = Stevens

Perth, Western Australia.

<= o:p>

------=_NextPart_000_0007_01CFB995.8DD5D2E0--