X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2014 09:02:21 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from d.mail.sonic.net ([64.142.111.50] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 6.0.9e) with ESMTPS id 7097214 for lml@lancaironline.net; Fri, 15 Aug 2014 08:26:52 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=64.142.111.50; envelope-from=superdmp@sonic.net Received: from Homebrew (107-209-212-146.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net [107.209.212.146]) (authenticated bits=0) by d.mail.sonic.net (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id s7FCQE93014882 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT) for ; Fri, 15 Aug 2014 05:26:14 -0700 X-Original-Message-ID: Reply-To: "David Powell" From: "David Powell" X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" References: In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: [LML] L360 static ports X-Original-Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2014 05:19:38 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0024_01CFB848.82923610" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 16.4.3528.331 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V16.4.3528.331 X-Sonic-CAuth: UmFuZG9tSVazlvymm34kXa75HZIsipq/vqPWcAIUPUUfHUsdZA/podbV1tQormmtTJMjgXOjl+cYvYFycQl6wNfruozOw64jrHS31lHvQnY= X-Sonic-ID: C;MgYQWXck5BGpD82354E5FQ== M;In9gWXck5BGpD82354E5FQ== X-Spam-Flag: No X-Sonic-Spam-Details: 0.0/5.0 by cerberusd This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0024_01CFB848.82923610 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable In the 360 that I purchased, I believe the builder put some kind of = protective box (wood by the feel of it) around the sensitive areas. = I=E2=80=99m not certain, but it appears he also ran some other lines or = wires through the area because the boxed areas seem bigger than = necessary for just the static system. Hope that helps, Dave From: Stevens Family=20 Sent: Friday, August 15, 2014 4:09 AM To: Lancair Mailing List=20 Subject: [LML] L360 static ports A question for those who have gone before me. I am just getting to the = stage of planning my static system. I plan on putting in two static = ports, one on either side of the fuselage, as suggested in the manual. = The recommended position is about half way along the sides of the = baggage area. They suggest using a Nylon Nylo-seal 268N fitting bonded = into the honeycomb of the side panel. This would protrude what looks to = be about an inch into the baggage area. The Nylo-seal tubing then = attaches to the fitting, which will result in the whole connection = protruding at least 2=E2=80=9D into the baggage area. =20 Whilst I am sure this will work well as far as the static system is = concerned, it seems to me that it will only be a matter of time before = an errant piece of baggage being placed into the baggage area will land = on the protruding tubing and damage and/or break the nylo-seal fitting. =20 What have others done about this? I thought of using a Nylo-seal 269N = elbow fitting, but it is not clear (at least to me!) from the = specifications that this will work. =20 I am interested in what others have done. =20 Thanks for help. =20 Regards, =20 Rob Stevens Perth, Western Australia. =20 ------=_NextPart_000_0024_01CFB848.82923610 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
In the 360 that I purchased, I = believe the=20 builder put some kind of protective box (wood by the feel of it) around = the=20 sensitive areas. I=E2=80=99m not certain, but it appears he also ran = some other lines or=20 wires through the area because the boxed areas seem bigger than = necessary for=20 just the static system.
 
Hope that helps,
Dave
 
 
Sent: Friday, August 15, 2014 4:09 AM
Subject: [LML] L360 static ports
 

A question for those who have gone before me. I am = just=20 getting to the stage of planning my static system. I plan on putting in = two=20 static ports, one on either side of the fuselage, as suggested in = the =20 manual. The recommended position is about half way along the sides of = the=20 baggage area. They suggest  using a Nylon Nylo-seal 268N fitting = bonded=20 into the honeycomb of the side panel. This would protrude what looks to = be about=20 an inch into the baggage area. The Nylo-seal tubing then attaches to the = fitting, which will result in the whole connection protruding at least = 2=E2=80=9D into=20 the baggage area.

 

Whilst I am sure this will work well as far as the = static=20 system is concerned, it seems to me that it will only be a matter of = time before=20 an errant piece of baggage being placed into the baggage area will land = on the=20 protruding tubing and damage and/or break the nylo-seal = fitting.

 

What have others done about this? I thought of = using a=20 Nylo-seal 269N elbow fitting, but it is not clear (at least to me!) from = the=20 specifications that this will work.

 

I am interested in what others have = done.

 

Thanks for help.

 

Regards,

 

Rob Stevens

Perth, Western Australia.

 

 
------=_NextPart_000_0024_01CFB848.82923610--