Return-Path: Received: from secure.smtp.email.msn.com ([207.46.181.28]) by ns1.olsusa.com (Post.Office MTA v3.5.3 release 223 ID# 0-64832U3500L350S0V35) with ESMTP id com for ; Thu, 5 Oct 2000 13:19:22 -0400 Received: from libretto110ct - 63.30.197.125 by email.msn.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Thu, 5 Oct 2000 10:25:17 -0700 Message-ID: <000a01c02ef1$6be5eb40$7dc51e3f@libretto110ct> From: "John Lasher" To: Subject: Re: Re:Lancair IV-P Heating problems climbing through FL 190 Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2000 12:26:37 -0500 Return-Path: johnlasher@msn.com X-Mailing-List: lancair.list@olsusa.com Reply-To: lancair.list@olsusa.com Mime-Version: 1.0 <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> << Lancair Builders' Mail List >> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> Brent, I have a single electronic ignition (EI by Klaus Savier) and a mag with both ignitions set at 24 degrees BTDC at manifold pressures greater than 25". They fire separate plugs in each cylinder with the EI plugs set at 0.032" gap. Since almost all of the flight is above 25", both plugs fire together during climb and cruise. The EI advances to about 40-45 degrees BTDC at low manifold pressures for a very smooth idle and is set to TDC for starting (rpm < 150). I purchased the IV-P with the ignition system as outlined above. I believe that detonation should be even less likely in my configuration then standard dual mags. I do like the system, however, it could be the source of my heating problems during climb. I'm open for any suggestions. It is of interest to me that you climb at 85% power rather than 75%. I was parked near you at OSH and saw your beautiful Lycoming installation. Would you consider climbing at 85% with the Continental engine? Also, my typical climb is at 160-165 KIAS with about 800 - 1000 fpm climb. The major difference in our climbs seems to be that your EGTs and CHTs remain in a reasonable range all the way up to FL280 while mine only make it to FL190 or slightly higher depending on the OAT. Again, I do start to notice a fall in my fuel flow from 30 gph to about 28 gph at the same time the temperatures start to rise. Do you think that pulling the mixture back to 28-30 gph from your normal 30-32 gph would produce an excessive heat rise during your climb? Does your fuel flow remain constant during climb? What do you think could be causing a fuel flow decrease in my case? Remember that my manifold pressure and rpm are rock solid at 32" and 2500 rpm. respectfully John N411WB >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LML website: http://www.olsusa.com/Users/Mkaye/maillist.html LML Builders' Bookstore: http://www.buildersbooks.com/lancair Please send your photos and drawings to marvkaye@olsusa.com. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>