X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2014 14:43:39 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from mail-oa0-f48.google.com ([209.85.219.48] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 6.0.8) with ESMTPS id 6692872 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sat, 18 Jan 2014 14:39:30 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.85.219.48; envelope-from=pjdmiller@gmail.com Received: by mail-oa0-f48.google.com with SMTP id l6so1255770oag.21 for ; Sat, 18 Jan 2014 11:38:54 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.182.48.99 with SMTP id k3mr7785492obn.48.1390073934886; Sat, 18 Jan 2014 11:38:54 -0800 (PST) X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from [192.168.1.103] ([67.8.24.109]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id fz6sm18229456obb.3.2014.01.18.11.38.53 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sat, 18 Jan 2014 11:38:53 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: [LML] Another take on air filtration References: From: Paul Miller Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-40327EFA-E7C7-4A5B-87C9-324A62488584 X-Mailer: iPad Mail (10B146) In-Reply-To: X-Original-Message-Id: <314B7C53-55D6-48CF-9327-74E880EC9EBE@gmail.com> X-Original-Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2014 14:38:52 -0500 X-Original-To: Lancair Mailing List Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) --Apple-Mail-40327EFA-E7C7-4A5B-87C9-324A62488584 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Based on what I know can get through a large screen like that, I would advoc= ate using a larger cone of finer hardware mesh to deliver same results with b= etter protection against fod. My silicon numbers are same as your levels(goo= d i think). Pratts philosophy is no hardware in the engine compartment that c= ould get through the inlet screen. That screen could suck my Buick in. Paul On 2014-01-18, at 14:25, "Adam Molny" wrote: > I expect this will be somewhat controversial but I chose to go with no fil= ter whatsoever =E2=80=93 just coarse wire cloth with =C2=BD=E2=80=9D square o= penings. > =20 --Apple-Mail-40327EFA-E7C7-4A5B-87C9-324A62488584 Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Based on what I know can get through a= large screen like that, I would advocate using a larger cone of finer hardw= are mesh to deliver same results with better protection against fod. My sili= con numbers are same as your levels(good i think). Pratts philosophy is no h= ardware in the engine compartment that could get through the inlet screen. &= nbsp;That screen could suck my Buick in.

Paul

On 2014-0= 1-18, at 14:25, "Adam Molny" <Adam@ValidationPartners.com> wrote:

I expect this will be somewhat controversial but I chose to go with no filter whatsoever =E2=80=93 just coarse wire cloth with =C2=BD=E2=80=9D square open= ings.

 

= --Apple-Mail-40327EFA-E7C7-4A5B-87C9-324A62488584--