X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2014 12:28:17 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from col0-omc3-s6.col0.hotmail.com ([65.55.34.144] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 6.0.8) with ESMTP id 6682893 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sat, 11 Jan 2014 03:45:15 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=65.55.34.144; envelope-from=peterpawaviation@hotmail.com Received: from COL129-W16 ([65.55.34.135]) by col0-omc3-s6.col0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Sat, 11 Jan 2014 00:44:40 -0800 X-TMN: [O655kEHXW47kOYXC+H3N9RO32rETnB/G] X-Originating-Email: [peterpawaviation@hotmail.com] X-Original-Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: peterpawaviation@hotmail.com Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_872ce3dd-5066-40d2-ad72-09db868f4aba_" From: PETER WILLIAMS X-Original-To: Lancair Mailing List Subject: RE: [LML] Considering purchase of N301H X-Original-Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2014 03:44:40 -0500 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 11 Jan 2014 08:44:40.0611 (UTC) FILETIME=[5DFC4730:01CF0EA9] --_872ce3dd-5066-40d2-ad72-09db868f4aba_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable HI THERE i have been told that there is an owner on the west coast that flies at 180= knots and has a burn of about 9 gph which would give you 20kt/gal in both a IV and a IVP i have seen 235 knots at 17.5gph @ 6=2C500 feet (ric= h of peak) about 222 knots at 14.5 gph which would give you 15.3 kt/gal at 17=2C500 245 kt @ 14.5 gph which would give you 16.9 kt/gal if you pursuit of N301H doesnt work out=2C i would sell my IV 462WW for $13= 5=2C000 peter=20 =20 > To: lml@lancaironline.net > Date: Fri=2C 10 Jan 2014 22:50:52 -0500 > From: joeczabaranek@gmail.com > Subject: [LML] Considering purchase of N301H >=20 > LML=2C >=20 > I've been looking at N301H (IV) as a way to get a bit more space than my = 360. 301H is listed on Controller and based in palm beach. Does anyone ha= ve any gouge on this aircraft? =20 >=20 > I'm a little concerned that at twice the $ per flight hour I won't take i= t up as often just for fun. I'd be interested to hear your thoughts on cru= ising in a IV at max range and max endurance. The BSFC of the TSIO-550 is = only 5-10% worse than the IO-550 according to Conti. The cruise speeds ive= seen quoted are far from the published L/D MAX ( max range) speed of the I= V. Can anyone comment on operating at a more efficient 150-160kias? >=20 > Joe Czabaranek > -- > For archives and unsub http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.ht= ml = --_872ce3dd-5066-40d2-ad72-09db868f4aba_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

HI THERE

i have been told that there is an owner on the west coast that= flies at 180 knots and has a burn of about 9 gph

which would give you 20kt/gal

in both a IV and a IVP i have seen 235 = knots at 17.5gph @ 6=2C500 feet (rich of peak)

about 222 knots at 14.5 gph =3B which would give you 15.3 kt/gal

at 17=2C500 245 kt @ 14.5 gph =3B = which would give you 16.9 kt/gal<= /font>
=
if you pursuit of N301H= doesnt work out=2C i would sell my IV 462WW for $135=2C000

peter
=3B =3B =3B = =3B =3B =3B

>=3B To: lml@lancaironline.net
&g= t=3B Date: Fri=2C 10 Jan 2014 22:50:52 -0500
>=3B From: joeczabaranek@= gmail.com
>=3B Subject: [LML] Considering purchase of N301H
>=3B =
>=3B LML=2C
>=3B
>=3B I've been looking at N301H (IV) as a= way to get a bit more space than my 360. 301H is listed on Controller and= based in palm beach. Does anyone have any gouge on this aircraft?
&g= t=3B
>=3B I'm a little concerned that at twice the $ per flight hour = I won't take it up as often just for fun. I'd be interested to hear your t= houghts on cruising in a IV at max range and max endurance. The BSFC of th= e TSIO-550 is only 5-10% worse than the IO-550 according to Conti. The cru= ise speeds ive seen quoted are far from the published L/D MAX ( max range) = speed of the IV. Can anyone comment on operating at a more efficient 150-1= 60kias?
>=3B
>=3B Joe Czabaranek
>=3B --
>=3B For arch= ives and unsub http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.html

= --_872ce3dd-5066-40d2-ad72-09db868f4aba_--