X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2013 11:09:07 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: <2thman1@gmail.com> Received: from mail-pa0-f53.google.com ([209.85.220.53] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 6.0.7) with ESMTPS id 6568606 for lml@lancaironline.net; Tue, 29 Oct 2013 09:44:43 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.85.220.53; envelope-from=2thman1@gmail.com Received: by mail-pa0-f53.google.com with SMTP id kx10so33602pab.40 for ; Tue, 29 Oct 2013 06:44:08 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.68.134.133 with SMTP id pk5mr1617840pbb.89.1383053834351; Tue, 29 Oct 2013 06:37:14 -0700 (PDT) X-Original-Return-Path: <2thman1@gmail.com> Received: from [192.168.1.121] (c-208-53-115-208.customer.broadstripe.net. [208.53.115.208]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id c1sm34986692pbl.44.2013.10.29.06.37.13 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 29 Oct 2013 06:37:13 -0700 (PDT) References: In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-269B33B1-C1A1-4055-A9B9-7B132E8C0096 X-Original-Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: iPad Mail (11B511) From: John Barrett <2thman1@gmail.com> Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Canopy sun shade X-Original-Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2013 06:37:12 -0700 X-Original-To: Lancair Mailing List --Apple-Mail-269B33B1-C1A1-4055-A9B9-7B132E8C0096 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable in addition to Mark's comment I wouldn't want the black band or the pull tab= on the one pictured as they could interfere with seeing and avoiding traffi= c. John Barrett Sent from my iPad > On Oct 29, 2013, at 6:09 AM, Mark Sletten wrote: >=20 > Gang, >=20 > Unless it's a frame-less film I would be leery of any shade intended to ad= here to the canopy with static cling. The fold-up type have a flexible frame= that might be unwilling to shape to the curves of the canopy, especially fo= r the larger sizes. If that happens you might not get enough contact between= the material and the window to promote adherence. Even with suction cups, a= frame that isn't flexible enough to conform to the canopy shape will probab= ly be unacceptable. >=20 > I'd stick (ha!) with the film type, or get several of the smaller fold up s= tyle with suction cup attachments. >=20 > --Mark >=20 >=20 >> On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 6:40 AM, Steve Colwell wro= te: >> Angier, >>=20 >> Here are a couple of possibilities: >>=20 >> Sportys (a LOBO supporter) http://www.sportys.com/PilotShop/product/15751= >>=20 >> First Pryority Bank (had free stick on's at OSH one year) >> http://www.1st-of-pryor.com/ >>=20 >> Steve Colwell Legacy >>=20 >> -----Original Message----- >>=20 >> Subject: [LML] Canopy sun shade >>=20 >> In addition to my Kroger sun shade in the cockpit, I'm looking for a sun >> screen solution when the sun is low enough in the sky to render the Kroge= r >> useless. I've been to all the local auto parts stores with no luck. >> Any suggestions out there for a sun shade that will adhere to the canopy v= ia >> static cling, etc. ?? >> Thanks, >>=20 >> Angier Ames >> N4ZQ >> 74hrs >> -- >> For archives and unsub http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.ht= ml >>=20 >>=20 >> -- >> For archives and unsub http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.ht= ml >=20 --Apple-Mail-269B33B1-C1A1-4055-A9B9-7B132E8C0096 Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
in addition to Mark's comment I wouldn= 't want the black band or the pull tab on the one pictured as they could int= erfere with seeing and avoiding traffic.

John Barre= tt

Sent from my iPad


On Oct 29, 2013, at= 6:09 AM, Mark Sletten <mwsletten@= gmail.com> wrote:

Gang,

Unless it's a frame-less film I would be l= eery of any shade intended to adhere to the canopy with static cling. The fo= ld-up type have a flexible frame that might be unwilling to shape to the cur= ves of the canopy, especially for the larger sizes. If that happens you migh= t not get enough contact between the material and the window to promote adhe= rence. Even with suction cups, a frame that isn't flexible enough to conform= to the canopy shape will probably be unacceptable.

I'd stick (ha!) with the film type, or get several of th= e smaller fold up style with suction cup attachments.

--Mark


On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 6:40 AM, Steve Colwell <mcmess1919@yahoo.com&= gt; wrote:
Angier,

Here are a couple of possibilities:

Sportys (a LOBO supporter) http://www.sportys.com/PilotShop/product/15751

First Pryority Bank (had free stick on's at OSH one year)
http://www.1st-of= -pryor.com/

Steve Colwell  Legacy

-----Original Message-----

Subject: [LML] Canopy sun shade

In addition to my Kroger sun shade in the cockpit, I'm looking for a sun
= screen solution when the sun is low enough in the sky to render the Kroger useless. I've been to all the local auto parts stores with no luck.
Any suggestions out there for a sun shade that will adhere to the canopy via=
static cling, etc. ??
Thanks,

Angier Ames
N4ZQ
74hrs
--
For archives and unsub http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/Lis= t.html


--
For archives and unsub http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/Lis= t.html

= --Apple-Mail-269B33B1-C1A1-4055-A9B9-7B132E8C0096--