X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2013 12:01:32 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from elasmtp-scoter.atl.sa.earthlink.net ([209.86.89.67] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 6.0.5) with ESMTP id 6416164 for lml@lancaironline.net; Tue, 13 Aug 2013 11:50:35 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.86.89.67; envelope-from=douglasbrunner@earthlink.net DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=dk20050327; d=earthlink.net; b=TKk7GU5v19QlQUs/FbQ1o7X+szI26OVQegUEWmr16Kmzz4Jl8rQlfPO3B4U2Sy1/; h=Received:From:To:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type:X-Mailer:Thread-Index:Content-Language:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP; Received: from [67.244.128.61] (helo=DougsVAIO) by elasmtp-scoter.atl.sa.earthlink.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1V9GrA-0006vr-RB for lml@lancaironline.net; Tue, 13 Aug 2013 11:50:01 -0400 From: "Douglas Brunner" X-Original-To: "'Lancair Mailing List'" References: In-Reply-To: Subject: RE: [LML] Re: ADS600-B experiences? X-Original-Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2013 11:50:31 -0400 X-Original-Message-ID: <008301ce983c$d7bab400$87301c00$@net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0084_01CE981B.50A91400" X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0 Thread-Index: Ac6X0sqzK8q1ivFoTS20dlPq646SlwAadukQ Content-Language: en-us X-ELNK-Trace: ad85a799c4f5de37c2eb1477c196d22294f5150ab1c16ac083d85a7b94e531756e1cd44bf0cc142959cb8bcab4959df8350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c X-Originating-IP: 67.244.128.61 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0084_01CE981B.50A91400 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Valid points. =20 What are your thoughts on a transponder with ES like the GTX 330 ES? =20 From: Lancair Mailing List [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of = Tim Olson Sent: Monday, August 12, 2013 11:11 PM To: lml@lancaironline.net Subject: [LML] Re: ADS600-B experiences? =20 I'd do the whole shebang. For one thing, right NOW is when the = companies are competing the hardest to get into the market. Prices may = actually rise later on. And, most systems can change to fit any new = requirements with a software change, at this point. May as well enjoy = the traffic and WX for more years. If it saves you $300 but you go 6 = years without it, are you really saving anything worthwhile? Tim On Aug 12, 2013, at 5:45 PM, "Douglas Brunner" = wrote: Thanks for the input. =20 I am wondering whether to get just ADS-B in now and comply with the = =E2=80=9Cout=E2=80=9D later. Unfortunately, that won=E2=80=99t give me = traffic. =20 I am a little worried that changes between now and then may make my = purchase obsolete. And of course I am hoping prices will come down too. =20 Doug =20 From: Lancair Mailing List [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of = jsabot@oxforditconsult.com Sent: Monday, August 12, 2013 4:47 PM To: lml@lancaironline.net Subject: [LML] Re: ADS600-B experiences? =20 Doug, =20 =20 I have a Navworx 600B and the Chelton Sport system. The two work well = together. Bill Moffitt stands behind his product and provided me with = phone support on Saturdays Sundays when I was in my hanger, configuring = the 600B with the Cheltons as well as wiring. Now if we could only get = the FAA to work out the bugs in their software we would be all set!=20 Jay M. Sabot Legacy N26XY -- =20 For archives and unsub = http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.html ------=_NextPart_000_0084_01CE981B.50A91400 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Valid points.

What are your thoughts on a transponder with ES like the GTX 330 = ES?

From:= = Lancair Mailing List [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of = Tim Olson
Sent: Monday, August 12, 2013 11:11 = PM
To: lml@lancaironline.net
Subject: [LML] Re: = ADS600-B experiences?

I'd do = the whole shebang. For one thing, right NOW is when the companies = are competing the hardest to get into the market. Prices may = actually rise later on. And, most systems can change to fit any = new requirements with a software change, at this point. May as = well enjoy the traffic and WX for more years. If it saves you $300 = but you go 6 years without it, are you really saving anything = worthwhile?

Tim

On Aug 12, 2013, at 5:45 PM, = "Douglas Brunner" <douglasbrunner@earthlink.net= > wrote:

Thanks for the input.

I am wondering whether to get just ADS-B in now and comply with the = =E2=80=9Cout=E2=80=9D later. Unfortunately, that won=E2=80=99t = give me traffic.

I am a little worried that changes between now and then may make my = purchase obsolete. And of course I am hoping prices will come down = too.

Doug

From:= = Lancair Mailing List [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net] = On Behalf Of jsabot@oxforditconsult.com=
Sent: Monday, August 12, 2013 4:47 PM
To: lml@lancaironline.net
Sub= ject: [LML] Re: ADS600-B = experiences?

Doug,

I have a Navworx 600B and the Chelton Sport system. The two work well = together. Bill Moffitt stands behind his product and provided me = with phone support on Saturdays Sundays when I was in my hanger, = configuring the 600B with the Cheltons as well as wiring. Now if we = could only get the FAA to work out the bugs in their software we would = be all set!
Jay M. Sabot
Legacy = N26XY
--
 =
For archives and unsub http://mail=
.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.html

------=_NextPart_000_0084_01CE981B.50A91400--