Posted for "Douglas Brunner"
<douglasbrunner@earthlink.net>:
> The only drawback that I can see to not using flaps (on a runway that is > long enough) is the
extra wear and tear on tires. Otherwise, it would seem > to be a pretty benign thing to do. And Matt is correct that when
you "dump" > the flaps there can be a pitch change and/or decrease in climb rate. > > > > I thought the comment was
unduly harsh and critical, although Matt did not > seem to have had his "spirit broken" based on his response. > > >
> There are dumb things that will get you killed - and I think it is our duty > to point those out. > > >
> Then there are differences in our normal operating procedures that don't > make that much difference - when applied
intelligently. For example: > > 1) I know a highly skilled pilot who does not like to use
full flaps on > landing. I use full flaps and I believe the handbook recommends that. > >
2) When I trained in the Legacy, there was no recommendation for low > boost on takeoff. I believe
that Lancair/HPAT has changed its > recommendations on that. > > 3) I have my speed brakes on my
stick. I know a very experienced > Lancair pilot who felt it was important to put it on his panel and cage it. > >
4) Bob Jeffrey teaches leaving the flaps down until you have reached > 1,000 ft. Other experienced
instructors don't. > > 5) I know several pilots that pull their mixture to idle cut off after >
landing to increase engine braking. > > 6) Etc. > > > > Getting on our
"high horse" about small things it not that productive. > > > > D. Brunner > > > >From: Lancair
Mailing List [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of Art > Jensen > Sent: Monday, August 12, 2013 4:47 PM > To:
lml@lancaironline.net > Subject: [LML] Re: To Marv > > > > > Maybe Wolfgang was short on political
correctness, but the truth remains > that if you cannot or do not fly the plane as it was meant to be flown then > you should not be
flying that plane. > > I believe everyone would agree that flaps do add a margin of safety and > should be used for take-off and
landing as per your POH and I believe every > instructor giving training in a Lancair would agree. If an instructor > reading this
disagrees, please share why you disagree with me. > > Art > > Sent from Yahoo! Mail for iPad > > >
> _____ > >From: steve <n5276j@aol.com>; > To: <lml@lancaironline.net>; >
Subject: [LML] Re: To Marv > Sent: Mon, Aug 12, 2013 5:39:28 PM > > > > > I second your post. I am surprised
by the comment. > > > > steve alderman N25SA 360 > > > > . >
> -----Original Message----- >From: Claudette Colwell <colwell.ch@gmail.com> > To: lml <lml@lancaironline.net> >
Sent: Mon, Aug 12, 2013 5:43 am > Subject: [LML] To Marv > > It is very regretful the comment from Wolfgang apparently directed to
Matt > appeared on the LML. This has always been a constructive exchange of > information and ideas. That type of
personal comment is not in keeping with > the spirit of cooperative sharing of information. > > > > Claudette
> > > > > > >
|