X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2013 07:29:35 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from nm26.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com ([98.138.90.89] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 6.0.5) with ESMTPS id 6397497 for lml@lancaironline.net; Tue, 30 Jul 2013 21:08:27 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=98.138.90.89; envelope-from=kyrilian_av@yahoo.com Received: from [98.138.90.56] by nm26.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 31 Jul 2013 01:07:53 -0000 Received: from [98.138.226.57] by tm9.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 31 Jul 2013 01:07:53 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by smtp208.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 31 Jul 2013 01:07:53 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 653079.59904.bm@smtp208.mail.ne1.yahoo.com X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-YMail-OSG: GzboehwVM1ms6HAi2YDEGO88IgC8g6e1UR0IlQOMiuWcVoZ vFlIo1e4R_c5lPvCwg2C0leJiisDSW4IfwlYzPD0drUJxbLoOz6VdI6waJnR k436jlH0L_Pnm3t9r79.oSrYmlcRcgzjl4pa0oWxbEcP8Yaj6XKGJtdWhYyh OzV5At2s4wYaFRUaTsJRMQkwU1XTioJEKbpmDydZ1pCkMxmW8RBJRGut0RP1 _hEg5.QdqBDvZX6CU4MDHD4mD62D_n0tOeX72jO6Guoc.rKMOnLbmRfjfgIA j5Cc4Uhc_Rjs6F0CQNpoG1rftfkvIDGDssSW2x84xKiRyufEA_0Dz9jvVSYI 8ZzNLTQ1I1qC3LefK70xIwmxIpfxOg.7NJc2IT0jtstGQJnTHiZpAXpoIZRA L2hX.u7PSosnLvSq7VMXxIwkrDziGfAZjTNCOMK1fBmI4YwWWe6fm_z3h3Xf CUEnfAs1AarBn5otPsKE1fcjtHCqAybcnQdXG0ISw7ldjKUoIFDYze2TJbeQ z9crV0VXmZQhtCj0- X-Yahoo-SMTP: mQCJX7qswBDY8ocVKU5pgYmL3O_ezrCW X-Rocket-Received: from [192.168.1.71] (kyrilian_av@107.204.97.190 with ) by smtp208.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with SMTP; 30 Jul 2013 18:07:53 -0700 PDT Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Potential Problem-Engine Vibration References: From: Kyrilian Dyer Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-75A922DF-9A18-4A31-B205-6BAE023CB998 X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (10A403) In-Reply-To: X-Original-Message-Id: <4747C670-EF1C-420E-A330-F3E09E3BB728@yahoo.com> X-Original-Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2013 21:07:50 -0400 X-Original-To: Lancair Mailing List , Charles Brown Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) --Apple-Mail-75A922DF-9A18-4A31-B205-6BAE023CB998 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Charley, I'd be happy to review. Just email me the csv files and I'll see what I can m= ake of them. - Kyrilian Sent from my iPhone On Jul 30, 2013, at 6:05 AM, Charles Brown wrote: > Good info Paul. I am a little chagrined to find that, after loading "Vibr= ation" on my iPhone and going out to collect data, things were a bunch smoot= her than I recalled. The only thing I changed was new spark plugs. But I t= hink it's clear that the vibration in my Legacy/IO550 is much less than what= I hear Bob and Steve describe. >=20 > Kyrilian, would you care to examine vibration data from a test ride? I ha= ve about 8 files of 15sec X 100Hz data taken with the iPhone secured to the i= nstrument panel and I don't know what to make of it. >=20 > Charley >=20 >=20 > On Jul 29, 2013, at 10:23 AM, Paul Miller wrote: >=20 > One thing to keep in mind is that the prop balancing on the ground is not a= s accurate as when the scimitar is loaded in flight. This comes directly fro= m one of the SX300 guys testing one of the Scimitars for Hartzell on his Lyc= 580. What he did was run the cables through the heat duct and perform the= balance in flight conditions. He reported that balancing the scimitars was= not easy. I had a hard time finding a good balance on the ground on the Le= gacy but it was passable. I may try the in-flight balance next time at the 2= 300 rpm mark. Our Legacy scimitars are simply cut shorter than the longer b= laded scimitars for ground clearance. >=20 > Second, the engine and cowl moves a lot and the clearances are very tight i= n the Legacy. At 2700 RPM and low airspeed the cowl is different shape than= at cruise and the engine is in a different position relative to the mounts t= hat at 2300. The torque on the engine mounts is much different at 2300 vers= us 2700. I found a lot of interference showed up as the RPM came down from 2= 700 to 2300 and then the engine and cowling were slightly separated so that t= he banging was transmitted. I believe at other settings the engine was up a= gainst parts of the cowl and the actual vibration was transmitted. I had th= e nose gear interference as well plus the baffling hit the prop governor cab= le in cruise. Lots of areas where interference fits are really tight. My p= oint is that there are many factors that can affect vibration with changing t= hrottle and RPM and it isn't just the prop/crankshaft combo that can be at i= ssue. I was seeing almost two inches of cowl movement between rest and flig= ht at certain locations. Thats a lot. >=20 > Not to take anything away from the issue under discussion except to say th= at, in my Legacy, vibration amplitude did change with varying RPM as a resul= t of mechanical interference. >=20 > Paul > Legacy >=20 >=20 --Apple-Mail-75A922DF-9A18-4A31-B205-6BAE023CB998 Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Charley,
I'd be happy to rev= iew. Just email me the csv files and I'll see what I can make of them.
=
- Kyrilian

Sent from my iPhone

On Jul 30, 2013, at= 6:05 AM, Charles Brown <browncc1= @verizon.net> wrote:

Good info Paul.  I am a little chagrined to find that, after loading "= Vibration" on my iPhone and going out to collect data, things were a bunch s= moother than I recalled.  The only thing I changed was new spark plugs.=  But I think it's clear that the vibration in my Legacy/IO550 is much l= ess than what I hear Bob and Steve describe.

Kyrili= an, would you care to examine vibration data from a test ride?  I have a= bout 8 files of 15sec X 100Hz data taken with the iPhone secured to the inst= rument panel and I don't know what to make of it.

C= harley


On Jul 29, 2013, at 10:23 AM, Paul M= iller wrote:

One thing to keep in mind is that the prop balancing on the ground is no= t as accurate as when the scimitar is loaded in flight. This comes directly f= rom one of the SX300 guys testing one of the Scimitars for Hartzell on his L= yc 580.   What he did was run the cables through the heat duct and perf= orm the balance in flight conditions.  He reported that balancing the s= cimitars was not easy.  I had a hard time finding a good balance on the= ground on the Legacy but it was passable.  I may try the in-flight bal= ance next time at the 2300 rpm mark.  Our Legacy scimitars are simply c= ut shorter than the longer bladed scimitars for ground clearance.

Second, the engine and cowl moves a lot and the clearances are very= tight in the Legacy.  At 2700 RPM and low airspeed the cowl is differe= nt shape than at cruise and the engine is in a different position relative t= o the mounts that at 2300.  The torque on the engine mounts is much dif= ferent at 2300 versus 2700.  I found a lot of interference showed up as= the RPM came down from 2700 to 2300 and then the engine and cowling were sl= ightly separated so that the banging was transmitted.  I believe at oth= er settings the engine was up against parts of the cowl and the actual vibra= tion was transmitted.  I had the nose gear interference as well plus th= e baffling hit the prop governor cable in cruise.  Lots of areas where i= nterference fits are really tight.  My point is that there are many fac= tors that can affect vibration with changing throttle and RPM and it isn't j= ust the prop/crankshaft combo that can be at issue.  I was seeing almos= t two inches of cowl movement between rest and flight at certain locations. &= nbsp; Thats a lot.

Not to take anything away from t= he issue under discussion except to say that, in my Legacy, vibration amplit= ude did change with varying RPM as a result of mechanical interference.

Paul
Legacy