X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Sat, 27 Jul 2013 22:00:37 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from blu0-omc3-s6.blu0.hotmail.com ([65.55.116.81] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 6.0.5) with ESMTP id 6393651 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sat, 27 Jul 2013 19:42:42 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=65.55.116.81; envelope-from=gary21sn@hotmail.com Received: from BLU172-DS2 ([65.55.116.72]) by blu0-omc3-s6.blu0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Sat, 27 Jul 2013 16:42:09 -0700 X-TMN: [obvRTaCeGyZyYMXL7zgY+BTRijNDKrXS] X-Originating-Email: [gary21sn@hotmail.com] X-Original-Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: gary21sn@hotmail.com From: "Gary Edwards" X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" Subject: Re: Tfr X-Original-Date: Sat, 27 Jul 2013 16:42:13 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0068_01CE8AE8.3EF9B100" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: MSN 9 Seal-Send-Time: Sat, 27 Jul 2013 16:42:13 -0700 X-MimeOLE: Produced By MSN MimeOLE V10.50.0008.2100 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 27 Jul 2013 23:42:09.0316 (UTC) FILETIME=[E8EA9640:01CE8B22] This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0068_01CE8AE8.3EF9B100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable My source of info are the pilots of the company (Erickson); US contract = planes. I cannot verify it any other way. Maybe contracts for other = aircraft related services that are included in the link you supplied = have a different international arrangement than contracts for fighting = fires. Gary=20 ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Paul Miller=20 To: lml@lancaironline.net=20 Sent: Saturday, July 27, 2013 11:41 AM Subject: [LML] Re: Tfr I must ask where that news bite comes from. Contracts to perform work = in either country are common. These guys below in the link are from = north dakota and have been fighting hail in Canada for more than 15 = years during the summer in US registered aircraft. Then they go south = to chile to protect the grape crops in winter. Just curious. http://www.weathermodification.com/projects.php?id=3D6 Paul On 2013-07-27, at 13:34, "Gary Edwards" = > . They can fight = fires in the US, but US planes cannot fight fires in Canada. ------=_NextPart_000_0068_01CE8AE8.3EF9B100 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
My source of info are the pilots of the company (Erickson); US = contract planes.  I cannot verify it any other way.  Maybe = contracts=20 for other aircraft related services that are included in the link you = supplied=20 have a different international arrangement than contracts for fighting=20 fires.
 
Gary 
----- Original = Message -----=20
Sent: Saturday, July 27, 2013 11:41 AM
Subject: [LML] Re: Tfr

I must ask where that news bite comes from.   Contracts to = perform=20 work in either country are common.  These guys below in the link = are from=20 north dakota and have been fighting hail in Canada for more than 15 = years during=20 the summer in US registered aircraft.  Then they go south to chile = to=20 protect the grape crops in winter.  Just curious.

http://ww= w.weathermodification.com/projects.php?id=3D6

Paul

On 2013-07-27, at 13:34, "Gary Edwards" <gary21sn@hotmail.com> .  They can fight = fires in the=20 US, but US planes cannot fight fires in = Canada.
------=_NextPart_000_0068_01CE8AE8.3EF9B100--