X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com
Return-Path: <billhogarty@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-oa0-f49.google.com ([209.85.219.49] verified)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 6.0.5)
  with ESMTPS id 6377368 for lml@lancaironline.net; Wed, 17 Jul 2013 23:32:18 -0400
Received-SPF: pass
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.85.219.49; envelope-from=billhogarty@gmail.com
Received: by mail-oa0-f49.google.com with SMTP id n9so648417oag.22
        for <lml@lancaironline.net>; Wed, 17 Jul 2013 20:31:44 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        bh=OuhYp0dOwq4of5jbuszsWf8tkdGNV84QcNzVz+mSll8=;
        b=CnvTJ0KwyjMNoaIGH5pIT/w3dlkk9lLzWJanKHqARPlbyLSdlBvUUubFFVl1n+rj0W
         vzuYO30kc+hft8dKnRrm+sX+kL1Yg9PBrWNvd+HLch6qFadDeSiCPy+03nIodPMAk4r2
         HnvU0SrHmwGaejbxVZQ5yTn8qrjDw7lVW+78WTDLd+oRt2jS8oWjAiNgTC1lsxiKSKQx
         jcNWl4s1quwEyVdtlJj3Ma7luOMRC1JIqN77vD8bi7mkcdO8BEBznoHYBZkGzvZEigGT
         89kXfcCl2yor0tbRRQE8Ap23lEEnOxbBRfJi659VQVI2JNeeEhGjWx1cxxC8m+KkjZFg
         b+IA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.182.227.227 with SMTP id sd3mr2031734obc.68.1374118304396;
 Wed, 17 Jul 2013 20:31:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.182.34.169 with HTTP; Wed, 17 Jul 2013 20:31:44 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <list-6377165@logan.com>
References: <list-6377165@logan.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2013 20:31:44 -0700
Message-ID: <CAAXEWUoWQ2wZDT=V8GQYtwb8YRNrR+2P3F3Ek984NBkJbGD+tA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [LML] Added Fuel tank
From: "William A. Hogarty" <billhogarty@gmail.com>
To: Lancair Mailing List <lml@lancaironline.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c359c469bc4104e1c0d908

--001a11c359c469bc4104e1c0d908
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Paul:

If you were the actual builder that held an FAA repairmans licence for the
aircraft in question, I think that you would be O.K.
but check your phase 2 limitations.  The new limitations allow you to make
a major change, fly off 5 hours to check all the
 numbers, then make a maintenance record entry and continue to operate.

Regards, Bill Hogarty


On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 1:45 PM, Paul Miller <pjdmiller@gmail.com> wrote:

> Do Experimentals require the same 337 for fuel tanks "in passenger cabin
> or baggage" compartments?  My thought was "no" but the FARs seem to cover
> "aircraft".  I am not the builder either.
>
>
> --
> For archives and unsub
> http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.html
>

--001a11c359c469bc4104e1c0d908
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr"><div>Paul:</div><div>=A0</div><div>If you were the actual =
builder that held an FAA repairmans licence for the aircraft in question, I=
 think that you would be O.K.=A0</div><div>but check your phase 2 limitatio=
ns.=A0 The new limitations allow you to make a major change, fly off 5 hour=
s to check all the</div>
<div>=A0numbers, then make a maintenance record entry and continue to opera=
te.</div><div>=A0</div><div>Regards, Bill Hogarty</div></div><div class=3D"=
gmail_extra"><br><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 1:4=
5 PM, Paul Miller <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:pjdmiller@gmail.c=
om" target=3D"_blank">pjdmiller@gmail.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1p=
x #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Do Experimentals require the same 337 for fu=
el tanks &quot;in passenger cabin or baggage&quot; compartments? =A0My thou=
ght was &quot;no&quot; but the FARs seem to cover &quot;aircraft&quot;. =A0=
I am not the builder either.<br>

<br>
<br>
--<br>
For archives and unsub <a href=3D"http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lm=
l/List.html" target=3D"_blank">http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/L=
ist.html</a><br>
</blockquote></div><br></div>

--001a11c359c469bc4104e1c0d908--