X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Mon, 01 Jul 2013 08:01:05 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from mail.sdc.com ([161.58.179.10] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 6.0.5) with ESMTPS id 6355604 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sun, 30 Jun 2013 12:31:40 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=161.58.179.10; envelope-from=ronald@sdc.com Received: from ASUSpc [97.79.20.218] by mail.sdc.com with ESMTP (SMTPD-12.3.0.100) id 2b6f0001502e9f86; Sun, 30 Jun 2013 12:25:10 -0400 From: "Ronald Stevens" X-Original-To: "'Lancair Mailing List'" References: In-Reply-To: Subject: RE: [LML] Re: Never Wet... X-Original-Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2013 12:30:53 -0400 X-Original-Message-ID: <006f01ce75af$31229680$9367c380$@sdc.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0070_01CE758D.AA11B9D0" X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 15.0 Thread-Index: AQCe/ih3KT/L1/w8KufnLwdFfTDPBZutYTew Content-Language: en-us This is a multipart message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0070_01CE758D.AA11B9D0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I asked Matthew Collier and he thinks the stuff is not bad for the skin, however I have an uncle testing it and he says it leaves a blurry film, so not sure how it will look. Also it says that you cannot use pressure washing, and a nice fat rain, is acting the same way, right LOL But it would be great if we would have some test results, and to see if it actually can stop (or even partially) having a de-ice factor in it. Anybody like to be a test rabbit lol == Ronald From: Lancair Mailing List [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of Douglas Brunner Sent: Sunday, June 30, 2013 12:12 PM To: lml@lancaironline.net Subject: [LML] Re: Never Wet... Ron, I would be interested in how well it holds up at 230 kts. (And at near supersonic speed on the prop) D. Brunner From: Lancair Mailing List [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of Ronald Stevens Sent: Friday, June 28, 2013 7:52 AM To: lml@lancaironline.net Subject: [LML] Never Wet... Hello guys Anybody already tried NeverWet as a method for not getting Ice on the wings and prop? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DZrjXSsfxMQ &feature=player_embedded -=- Ronald (LNC4-450 hours and counting...) ------=_NextPart_000_0070_01CE758D.AA11B9D0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I asked Matthew Collier and he thinks the stuff is not bad for the = skin, however I have an uncle testing it and he says it leaves a blurry = film, so not sure how it will look. Also it says that you cannot use = pressure washing, and a nice fat rain, is acting the same way, right = LOL

 

But it would be great if we would have some test results, and to see = if it actually can stop (or even partially) having a de-ice factor in = it. Anybody like to be a test rabbit lol

 

=3D=3D Ronald

 

From: Lancair = Mailing List [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of Douglas = Brunner
Sent: Sunday, June 30, 2013 12:12 PM
To: = lml@lancaironline.net
Subject: [LML] Re: Never = Wet...

 

Ron,

 

I would be interested in how well it holds up at 230 kts.  (And = at near supersonic speed on the prop)

 

D. Brunner

 

From:= = Lancair Mailing List [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net] = On Behalf Of Ronald Stevens
Sent: Friday, June 28, 2013 = 7:52 AM
To: lml@lancaironline.net
Sub= ject: [LML] Never Wet...

 

Hello guys

 

Anybody already tried NeverWet as a method for not getting Ice on the = wings and prop?

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3DDZrjXSsfxMQ&feature=3Dpla= yer_embedded

 

 

-=3D- Ronald (LNC4-450 hours and = counting…..)

------=_NextPart_000_0070_01CE758D.AA11B9D0--