X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2013 08:32:52 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: <2thman1@gmail.com> Received: from mail-pa0-f52.google.com ([209.85.220.52] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 6.0.5) with ESMTPS id 6345238 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sun, 23 Jun 2013 10:13:46 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.85.220.52; envelope-from=2thman1@gmail.com Received: by mail-pa0-f52.google.com with SMTP id kq13so9899604pab.11 for ; Sun, 23 Jun 2013 07:13:10 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.68.178.161 with SMTP id cz1mr19649072pbc.27.1371996790450; Sun, 23 Jun 2013 07:13:10 -0700 (PDT) X-Original-Return-Path: <2thman1@gmail.com> Received: from [192.168.1.109] ([24.56.209.218]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id ve3sm13634275pbc.14.2013.06.23.07.13.09 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sun, 23 Jun 2013 07:13:09 -0700 (PDT) References: In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-6439D95B-0F31-4C75-BEC6-20CFE7EE2983 X-Original-Message-Id: <2F2D8DE4-6D1A-46AC-A687-ECA558100A33@gmail.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: iPad Mail (10B329) From: John Barrett <2thman1@gmail.com> Subject: Re: [LML] Power for ES X-Original-Date: Sun, 23 Jun 2013 07:13:06 -0700 X-Original-To: Lancair Mailing List --Apple-Mail-6439D95B-0F31-4C75-BEC6-20CFE7EE2983 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Ed, I was interested in it about ten years ago for my IVP project. Fortunately I= couldn't wait for the 1 or 2 year projection of availability they promised.= John Sent from my iPad On Jun 23, 2013, at 4:41 AM, "Ed Gray" wrote: > Just starting on our ES fastbuild, so 2 or 3 years away from engine decisi= on. Love the concept of the Deltahawk 200 hp. They say they are 1-2 years a= way from cert. engines, experimental sooner. 200 hp should be plenty for ta= keoff, since much more torque available, and the 200 is there all the way up= to flight levels. Fuel savings in 2000 hours will pay for the engine, plus= no worries about 100 LL. Anyone else looking at this engine? Ed Gray --Apple-Mail-6439D95B-0F31-4C75-BEC6-20CFE7EE2983 Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Ed,

I was interested in it about ten years ago for my IVP project. Fortunately I couldn't wait for the 1 or 2 year projection of availability they promised.

John

Sent from my iPad

On Jun 23, 2013, at 4:41 AM, "Ed Gray" <egraylaw@swbell.net> wrote:

Just starting on our ES fastbuild, so 2 or 3 years away from engine decision. Love the concept of the Deltahawk 200 hp. They say they are 1-2 years away from cert. engines, experimental sooner. 200 hp should be plenty for takeoff, since much more torque available, and the 200 is there all the way up to flight levels. Fuel savings in 2000 hours will pay for the engine, plus no worries about 100 LL. Anyone else looking at this engine? Ed Gray

--Apple-Mail-6439D95B-0F31-4C75-BEC6-20CFE7EE2983--