X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Sun, 02 Jun 2013 14:08:33 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from smtp13.services.sfr.fr ([93.17.128.130] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 6.0.5) with ESMTP id 6302767 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sun, 02 Jun 2013 07:39:31 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=93.17.128.130; envelope-from=gilles.canese@sfr.fr Received: from filter.sfr.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by msfrf1302.sfr.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id B80DF300002C2 for ; Sun, 2 Jun 2013 13:38:56 +0200 (CEST) Received: from wsfrf1336 (wsfrf1336 [10.18.30.50]) by msfrf1302.sfr.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 9D96B300002C0 for ; Sun, 2 Jun 2013 13:38:56 +0200 (CEST) X-SFR-UUID: 20130602113856645.9D96B300002C0@msfrf1302.sfr.fr X-Original-Date: Sun, 2 Jun 2013 13:38:56 +0200 (CEST) From: gilles.canese@sfr.fr Reply-To: gilles.canese@sfr.fr X-Original-To: lml@lancaironline.net X-Original-Message-ID: <474380834.106565.1370173136637.JavaMail.www@wsfrf1336> Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Lancair 360 CHT during climb MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Country-Code: X-Cache-ID: Message-Context: email-message X-Message-Size: X-SAVECOPY: true X-sfr-spamrating: 40.000000 X-sfr-spam: not-spam X-National-Code: X-ORIGINATING-IP: 109.31.119.2 X-Cache-Entry: X-Wum-ChannelType: X-Wum-Nature: EMAIL-NATURE X-WUM-FROM: |~| X-WUM-TO: |~| X-WUM-REPLYTO: |~| Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_106564_594301233.1370173136636" ------=_Part_106564_594301233.1370173136636 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Thanks for the answers=20 Meanwhile I will consider climb out at 135 kts and will check the baffling = and timing on mags=20 Diificult to richen more at take off, I have already 17,2 GPH at full power= . At the end, the excursion above 400=C2=B0F is short, only after take at = full power=20 Concerning the RV's I think that there is much more space between engine an= d the cowling that makes difference =20 For Chris, in cruise all CHT's are below 350 =C2=B0F and LOP between 305 an= d 335 =C2=B0F The airfield altiude is 600 ft and OAT arround to 15=C2=B0C Thank you to everybody for all comments and help Gilles=20 =20 Cet e-mail est solidaire : un clic ici =3D un don pour l=E2=80=99associatio= n Action contre la Faim -- Envoy=C3=A9 via mailforgood =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D Message du : 01/06/2013 23:40 De : "Chris Zavatson " A : lml@lancaironline.net Copie =C3=A0 :=20 Sujet : [LML] Re: Lancair 360 CHT during climb Gilles, There are many 360s out there not cooling as well as they should. So even = if it is 'normal', it may not be desirable. Are the values you listed peak or momentary, or are they sustained or avera= ge values in the climb. Also, what is the elevation at take-off and OAT. = Are these values from the first takeoff of the day or after a short stop s= omewhere with everything still hot. Perhaps a better evaluation could be m= ade at a steady state point of wide open throttle cruise leaned for best po= wer. =20 =20 Chris Zavatson =20 N91CZ 360std www.N91CZ.net From: Gilles Canese To: lml@lancaironline.net=20 Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2013 4:44 PM Subject: [LML] Lancair 360 CHT during climb Hello=20 I am a new Lancair 360 owner and I have a question about CHT during climbin= g At full power after take off, CHT 's are between 380 and 415 oF, is it n= ormal for a 360? Thanks for the answers=20 Gilles=20 Envoy=C3=A9 de mon iPad -- For archives and unsub http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.html ------=_Part_106564_594301233.1370173136636 Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Thanks for the answers

M= eanwhile I will consider climb out at 135 kts and will check the baffling a= nd timing on mags

Diificult to richen more a= t take off, I have already 17,2 GPH at full power. At the end, the excursio= n above 400=C2=B0F is short,  only after take at full power

Concerning the RV's I think that there is much more sp= ace between engine and the cowling that  makes difference  

For Chris, in cruise all CHT's are below 350 =C2= =B0F and LOP between 305 and 335 =C2=B0F The airfield altiude is 600 ft and= OAT arround to 15=C2=B0C

Thank you to everyb= ody for all comments and help

Gilles <= /p>

 



=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D

Message du : 01/06/2013 23:40
De : "Chris Zavatso= n " <chris_zavatson@yahoo.com>
A : lml@lancaironline.net
Copie = =C3=A0 :
Sujet : [LML] Re: Lancair 360 CHT during climb


Gilles,
There are many 360= s out there not cooling as well as they should.  So even if it is 'nor= mal', it may not be desirable.
Are the values you listed peak or mo= mentary, or are they sustained or average values in the climb.  Also, = what is the elevation at take-off  and OAT.  Are these value= s from the first takeoff of the day or after a short stop somewhere wi= th everything still hot.  Perhaps a be= tter evaluation could be made at a steady state point of wide open thr= ottle cruise leaned for best power. 
 
Chris Zavatson=     
N91CZ
360std
www.N91CZ.net

<= b>From: Gilles Canese <gil= les.canese@sfr.fr>
To: lml@lancaironline.net
Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2013 4:44 PM
Subject: [LML] Lancair 360 CHT during climb

Hello
I am a new Lancair 360 owner and I have a question about CH= T during climbing At full power after take off,  CHT 's are between 38= 0 and 415 oF, is it normal for a 360?

Thanks for the answers
Gilles


Envoy=C3=A9 de mon iPad
--
For archives and unsub= http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.html


------=_Part_106564_594301233.1370173136636--