X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Sun, 03 Mar 2013 18:17:03 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from mout.gmx.net ([74.208.4.201] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 6.0.1) with ESMTP id 6093578 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sun, 03 Mar 2013 17:07:19 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=74.208.4.201; envelope-from=cfi@instructor.net Received: from mailout-us.mail.com ([172.19.198.49]) by mrigmx.server.lan (mrigmxus001) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0LoEP7-1UirqW04y1-00gE4p for ; Sun, 03 Mar 2013 23:06:45 +0100 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 03 Mar 2013 22:06:43 -0000 Received: from mobile-166-147-116-177.mycingular.net (EHLO [10.203.81.138]) [166.147.116.177] by mail.gmx.com (mp-us009) with SMTP; 03 Mar 2013 17:06:43 -0500 X-Authenticated: #73491717 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+5OQhGLgq59bhVVt94+unW4UHy449Ok7aqtgIUSs qly8sb6jVkH9k/ Subject: Re: [LML] Re: PGUM to KJAX References: From: Ron Galbraith Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-696AC4CE-9674-4C00-91EE-B3DD834D666C X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (10B146) In-Reply-To: X-Original-Message-Id: <0C904C32-3BCE-49B6-9B2E-D16B929BC52C@instructor.net> X-Original-Date: Sun, 3 Mar 2013 17:06:42 -0500 X-Original-To: Lancair Mailing List Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 --Apple-Mail-696AC4CE-9674-4C00-91EE-B3DD834D666C Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable IO550. Not TSIO550. Way different. =20 Sent from my iPhone On Mar 3, 2013, at 1:59 PM, "John Barrett" wrote: > I can=E2=80=99t figure out how Bill can keep a L-IV aloft at 7 or 8 gph. I= don=E2=80=99t think I could do straight and level even in ground effect in m= y IVP at that burn rate. Hats off to a magician. > =20 > John > =20 > From: Lancair Mailing List [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of Sky= 2high@aol.com > Sent: Sunday, March 03, 2013 8:10 AM > To: lml@lancaironline.net > Subject: [LML] Re: PGUM to KJAX > =20 > Sue, > =20 > Hmmmmmm, Let's see. > =20 > 370 x 6 =3D 2220 > 3 175 lb passengers + baggage =3D 600, plus 100 gals =3D 1200 > =20 > If Bill weighs 100, that's only 900 lbs of additional load to be carried -= that's more than "a lot" (technical term). > =20 > Also, at a quart of Canadian oil every 10 hours, that's a US gallon for th= e trip. > =20 > Add an immersion suit, truck inner tube as a float, flare gun, 1000 NoDoz t= abs, gallon of water and 20 peanut butter energy bars - why, its just incred= ible. > =20 > What a "trip" (psycho babble technical term) > =20 > Grayhawk the poltroon > =20 > =20 > =20 > In a message dated 3/3/2013 9:40:26 A.M. Central Standard Time, kitplanesu= e@gmail.com writes: > All the tanks hold about 370 gallons and Bill had the fuel flow down to ar= ound 7.3 > (if the instruments were reading correctly).Definitely below 8 gph, though= . LOP. >=20 > Sue >=20 >=20 >=20 > On Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 10:40 PM, Jim Hergert wrote: > This is beyond amazing to me. I figured about 38:38 hrs and I think he tol= d me it held about 480 gals. So with his planned 34/35 hrs it must have been= close. I kept refiguring the fuel burn at maybe 11/12 gph. That is just fue= l!! How about Oil? How about Ox? > Then it is the one Pilot no reliever! Wow from now on he is Mr. Bill to me= . > Congratulations! All involved. >=20 > I'm Jim Hergert > L4P N6XE (an Sexy) vs N6ZQ (an SexZ Q) get it? > 610 hrs TT, but not like Mr. Bill. >=20 > Sent from Jim's iPad > -- > For archives and unsub http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.htm= l > =20 --Apple-Mail-696AC4CE-9674-4C00-91EE-B3DD834D666C Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
IO550.  Not TSIO550.  Way di= fferent.  

Sent from my iPhone

On Mar 3, 2013, at 1= :59 PM, "John Barrett" <jbarrett= @carbinge.com> wrote:

I can=E2=80=99t figure out how Bill can k= eep a L-IV aloft at 7 or 8 gph.  I don=E2=80=99t think I could do strai= ght and level even in ground effect in my IVP at that burn rate.  Hats o= ff to a magician.

 

John

 

<= b>From: Lancair Mailing List [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net] On Behalf O= f Sky2high@aol.com
Sent: Sunday, March 03, 2013 8:10 AM
To: lml@lancaironline.net
Subject: [LML] Re: PGUM to K= JAX

 

Sue,

 

Hmmmmmm= ,  Let's see.

 

370 x 6 =3D 2220

3 175 lb passengers + baggage =3D= 600, plus 100 gals =3D 1200

 

If Bill weighs 100, that's only 900 lb= s of additional load to be carried - that's more than "a lot" (tec= hnical term).

 

Also, at a quart of Canadian oil every 10 hours, that= 's a US gallon for the trip.

 

Add an immersion suit, truck inner tub= e as a float, flare gun, 1000 NoDoz tabs, gallon of water and 20 peanut= butter energy bars - why, its just incredible.

 

What a "trip" (= psycho babble technical term)

 

Grayhawk the poltroon

 

 =

In a message dated 3/3/2013 9:40:26 A.M. Central Standard Tim= e, kitplanesue@gmail.com writes= :

= All the tanks hold about 370 gallons and Bill had the f= uel flow down to around 7.3
(if the instruments were reading correctly).D= efinitely below 8 gph, though. LOP.

Sue


=

On Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at= 10:40 PM, Jim Hergert <jimrher@aol.com> wrote:

This is beyond ama= zing to me. I figured about 38:38 hrs and I think he told me it held about 4= 80 gals. So with his planned 34/35 hrs it must have been close. I kept refig= uring the fuel burn at maybe 11/12 gph. That is just fuel!! How about Oil? H= ow about Ox?
Then it is the one Pilot no reliever! Wow from now on he is M= r. Bill to me.
Congratulations! All involved.

I'm Jim Hergert
L= 4P N6XE (an Sexy) vs N6ZQ (an SexZ Q) get it?
610 hrs TT, but not like Mr= . Bill.

Sent from Jim's iPad

<= p class=3D"MsoNormal"> 

= --Apple-Mail-696AC4CE-9674-4C00-91EE-B3DD834D666C--