X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2013 08:34:47 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from pit-mailgw-08.smarsh.com ([199.47.168.67] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 6.0.1) with ESMTPS id 6000617 for lml@lancaironline.net; Tue, 08 Jan 2013 08:32:00 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=199.47.168.67; envelope-from=ghp@trustedwealthadvisors.com Received: from [10.6.0.82] (helo=JobsC-PDX.smarshinc.com) by pit-mailgw-08.smarsh.com with esmtp (Smarsh SMTP 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1TsZH2-0004Pu-7s; Tue, 08 Jan 2013 08:31:24 -0500 Received: from [10.6.0.110] (helo=cambridge.smarsh.com)by pit-obdlp-03.smarsh.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256)(Smarsh SMTP 4.77)(envelope-from )id 1TsZGz-0002Vo-8o; Tue, 08 Jan 2013 08:31:21 -0500 Received: from ([173.163.46.146]) by cambridge.smarsh.com (IceWarp 10.4.3) with ASMTP (SSL) id TON08018; Tue, 08 Jan 2013 08:31:18 -0500 From: "Gordon Porter" X-Original-To: "'Bill Harrelson'" , References: In-Reply-To: Subject: RE: stalls X-Original-Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2013 08:32:05 -0500 X-Original-Message-ID: <085801cdeda4$8dc01e50$a9405af0$@com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0859_01CDED7A.A4EA1650" X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0 thread-index: Ac3tOjzyvlaIukKTTsWyUBSR0H7n/gAagZQQ Content-Language: en-us X-Smarsh-Out: 1 X-Smarsh-Out-CID: cid14628smarsh X-Smarsh-PID: 1TsZGz-0002Vo-8o ckx-imap-uid: 8571 ckx-imap-isUid: YES ckx-imap-seen: NO ckx-imap-answered: NO ckx-imap-deleted: NO ckx-imap-flagged: NO ckx-imap-draft: NO This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0859_01CDED7A.A4EA1650 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Bill.75 hours on the IV.you have been somewhat busy this winter!! If I had an engine I would try to catch up to you! How has your flight testing gone? Any target date for the BIG flight? Gordon ES N144GP From: Bill Harrelson [mailto:n5zq@verizon.net] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2013 7:51 PM To: lml@lancaironline.net Subject: Re: stalls OK Randy, here goes... Lycoming is better than Continental. From: Randylsnarr I am ready for a new fresh topic like header tank vs no header tank... Randy Snarr All seriousness aside, I only know of one person who has spun a 320/360. He is a very experienced guy, retired airline, lots of GA, lots of Lancair and long time designated flight examiner. He told me that it took a full 10,000 feet to recover and he was only able to get it out with full power. Just something to think about. Bill Harrelson N5ZQ 320 2,150 hrs N6ZQ IV 75 hrs ------=_NextPart_000_0859_01CDED7A.A4EA1650 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Bill…75 hours on the IV…you have been somewh= at busy this winter!!

If I had an= engine I would try to catch up to you!

How has your flight testing gone? Any target date for the B= IG flight?

&nbs= p;

Gordon

ES N144GP

From: Bill Harrelson [mailto:n5zq@verizon.net]
Sent: Monday, J= anuary 07, 2013 7:51 PM
To: lml@lancaironline.net
Subjec= t: Re: stalls

=

OK Randy, here goes= =2E..

<= /span>

Lycoming is better than Continenta= l.

From: Randylsnarr <= /o:p>

I am ready for a new fr= esh topic like header tank vs no header tank...

Randy Snarr

&n= bsp;

<= /span>

=

All seriousness aside, I only know of one person who has spun a 32= 0/360. He is a very experienced guy, retired airline, lots of GA, lots o= f Lancair and long time designated flight examiner. He told me tha= t it took a full 10,000 feet to recover and he was only able to get it o= ut with full power.

&n= bsp;

Just something to = think about.

Bill Harrelson<= /span>

N5ZQ 320 2,150 hrs

N6ZQ IV 75 hrs<= /span>

=

------=_NextPart_000_0859_01CDED7A.A4EA1650--