X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2013 06:20:51 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from elasmtp-kukur.atl.sa.earthlink.net ([209.86.89.65] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 6.0.1) with ESMTP id 6000040 for lml@lancaironline.net; Mon, 07 Jan 2013 21:19:50 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.86.89.65; envelope-from=colyncase@earthlink.net DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=dk20050327; d=earthlink.net; b=NCIFI8qIUbp+wEoGgFpTEC57jlXBQw8OKh1X79Z3dvLvx6CaxAgo/f8NbZVSWjPM; h=Received:From:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:To:References:Message-Id:X-Mailer:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP; Received: from [70.105.250.129] (helo=[192.168.1.34]) by elasmtp-kukur.atl.sa.earthlink.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1TsOmX-0006SR-Fz for lml@lancaironline.net; Mon, 07 Jan 2013 21:19:13 -0500 From: Colyn Case Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-38--800252388 Subject: Header tanks....or not. X-Original-Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2013 21:19:13 -0500 In-Reply-To: X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" References: X-Original-Message-Id: <358B2542-6F53-4365-AEC9-BDD0F52A13F1@earthlink.net> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) X-ELNK-Trace: 63d5d3452847f8b1d6dd28457998182d7e972de0d01da940683cac9dfbda14ca78329580d2c9f83e350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c X-Originating-IP: 70.105.250.129 --Apple-Mail-38--800252388 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Aw c'mon lets do the header tank one. =20 Bill can get us going I'm sure... On Jan 7, 2013, at 7:51 PM, Bill Harrelson wrote: OK Randy, here goes... =20 Lycoming is better than Continental. =20 From: Randylsnarr I am ready for a new fresh topic like header tank vs no header tank... =20 Randy Snarr =20 =20 =20 =20 All seriousness aside, I only know of one person who has spun a 320/360. = He is a very experienced guy, retired airline, lots of GA, lots of = Lancair and long time designated flight examiner. He told me that it = took a full 10,000 feet to recover and he was only able to get it out = with full power. =20 Just something to think about. =20 Bill Harrelson N5ZQ 320 2,150 hrs N6ZQ IV 75 hrs =20 =20 =20 --Apple-Mail-38--800252388 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii Aw c'mon lets do the header tank one.  
Bill can get us going I'm sure...


On Jan 7, 2013, at 7:51 PM, Bill Harrelson wrote:

OK Randy, here goes...
 
Lycoming is better than Continental.
 
I am ready for a new fresh topic like header tank vs no header tank...
 
Randy Snarr
 
 
 
 
All seriousness aside, I only know of one person who has spun a 320/360. He is a very experienced guy, retired airline, lots of GA, lots of Lancair and long time designated flight examiner.  He told me that it took a full 10,000 feet to recover and he was only able to get it out with full power.
 
Just something to think about.
 
Bill Harrelson
N5ZQ 320 2,150 hrs
N6ZQ  IV  75 hrs
 
 

 

--Apple-Mail-38--800252388--