X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Sun, 06 Jan 2013 08:34:09 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from imr-ma02.mx.aol.com ([64.12.206.40] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 6.0.1) with ESMTP id 5997213 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sat, 05 Jan 2013 18:00:10 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=64.12.206.40; envelope-from=vtailjeff@aol.com Received: from mtaomg-db01.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtaomg-db01.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.51.199]) by imr-ma02.mx.aol.com (Outbound Mail Relay) with ESMTP id 87E0E1C000091 for ; Sat, 5 Jan 2013 17:59:36 -0500 (EST) Received: from core-mna001c.r1000.mail.aol.com (core-mna001.r1000.mail.aol.com [172.29.106.1]) by mtaomg-db01.r1000.mx.aol.com (OMAG/Core Interface) with ESMTP id 61402E000085 for ; Sat, 5 Jan 2013 17:59:36 -0500 (EST) References: X-Original-To: lml@lancaironline.net Subject: Re: [LML] IV-P Cruise Altitudes? In-Reply-To: X-MB-Message-Source: WebUI MIME-Version: 1.0 From: vtailjeff@aol.com X-MB-Message-Type: User Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--------MB_8CFB9AF77CACDF6_2670_9D13D_webmailstg-d02.sysops.aol.com" X-Mailer: AOL Webmail 37276-STANDARD Received: from 24.107.65.42 by webmailstg-d02.sysops.aol.com (205.188.103.149) with HTTP (WebMailUI); Sat, 05 Jan 2013 17:59:36 -0500 X-Original-Message-Id: <8CFB9AF77C86C95-2670-3B856@webmailstg-d02.sysops.aol.com> X-Originating-IP: [24.107.65.42] X-Original-Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2013 17:59:36 -0500 (EST) x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:392797984:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d33c750e8b0586a7d This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ----------MB_8CFB9AF77CACDF6_2670_9D13D_webmailstg-d02.sysops.aol.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" I flight planned most of my trips in the mid to upper teens. Most of the tr= ips east-west so headwinds are a factor westbound. Many times it is to avo= id ice. If you fly above FL180 on an IFR flight plan you may not get a desc= ent when you need it to avoid ice.=20 Jeff -----Original Message----- From: Dan & Kari Olsen To: lml Sent: Sat, Jan 5, 2013 1:33 pm Subject: [LML] IV-P Cruise Altitudes? Greetings, =20 As I build my IV-P kit, I=E2=80=99m always watching with anticipation the o= ther IV-P planes out there and how you guys are using them. One thing that= has struck me is that it appears most of you with piston IV-P=E2=80=99s ar= e flying them around in the low- to mid-teens rather than in the flight lev= els. I=E2=80=99m curious why this is the case=E2=80=A6 Trips not long eno= ugh to justify the climb? You want to stay VFR? Performance or handling i= ssues up high? Etc. =20 Would love to hear from some of you on the operational practicalities of us= ing your IV-P as a X/C traveling machine. My expectation is that I=E2=80= =99ll be using mine a lot on lots of 1,000nm X/C flights and am planning to= fly in the FL220-FL250 range. =20 Thoughts? =20 Dan Olsen N320DK =E2=80=93 320MKII, 700hrs IV-P in progress =20 ----------MB_8CFB9AF77CACDF6_2670_9D13D_webmailstg-d02.sysops.aol.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8"
I flight planned most of my trips in the mid to upper teens.= Most of the trips east-west so  headwinds are a factor westbound. Man= y times it is to avoid ice. If you fly above FL180 on an IFR flight plan yo= u may not get a descent when you need it to avoid ice.
 
Jeff
-----Original Message-----
From: Dan & Kari Olsen <olsen25@comcast.net>
To: lml <lml@lancaironline.net>
Sent: Sat, Jan 5, 2013 1:33 pm
Subject: [LML] IV-P Cruise Altitudes?

Greetings,
 
As I build my IV-P kit, I=E2=80=99m always watchin= g with anticipation the other IV-P planes out there and how you guys are us= ing them.  One thing that has struck me is that it appears most of you= with piston IV-P=E2=80=99s are flying them around in the low- to mid-teens= rather than in the flight levels.  I=E2=80=99m curious why this is th= e case=E2=80=A6  Trips not long enough to justify the climb?  You= want to stay VFR?  Performance or handling issues up high?  Etc.=
 
Would love to hear from some of you on the operati= onal practicalities of using your IV-P as a X/C traveling machine.  My= expectation is that I=E2=80=99ll be using mine a lot on lots of 1,000nm X/= C flights and am planning to fly in the FL220-FL250 range.
 
Thoughts?
 
Dan Olsen
N320DK =E2=80=93 320MKII, 700hrs
IV-P in progress
----------MB_8CFB9AF77CACDF6_2670_9D13D_webmailstg-d02.sysops.aol.com--