X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Sat, 05 Jan 2013 11:19:58 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from blu0-omc3-s2.blu0.hotmail.com ([65.55.116.77] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 6.0.1) with ESMTP id 5996049 for lml@lancaironline.net; Fri, 04 Jan 2013 19:18:49 -0500 Received-SPF: neutral receiver=logan.com; client-ip=65.55.116.77; envelope-from=frederickmoreno@bigpond.com Received: from BLU0-SMTP77 ([65.55.116.72]) by blu0-omc3-s2.blu0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Fri, 4 Jan 2013 16:18:13 -0800 X-EIP: [/MzfoVf0C8BDR7acGwRZAOySYLLg4PoW] X-Originating-Email: [frederickmoreno@bigpond.com] X-Original-Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: frederickmoreno@bigpond.com Received: from Razzle ([58.165.209.75]) by BLU0-SMTP77.blu0.hotmail.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Fri, 4 Jan 2013 16:18:12 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Original-Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2013 08:18:00 +0800 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; charset="iso-8859-1"; boundary="------------Boundary-00=_06M4VW72QL8000000000" X-Mailer: IncrediMail (6395248) From: Frederick Moreno References: X-FID: FLAVOR00-NONE-0000-0000-000000000000 X-Priority: 3 X-Original-To: "Lancair Mail (lml@lancaironline.net)" Subject: Re: [LML] Re: stalls X-OriginalArrivalTime: 05 Jan 2013 00:18:12.0456 (UTC) FILETIME=[25FA8E80:01CDEADA] --------------Boundary-00=_06M4VW72QL8000000000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Thanks Bob. =0D =0D Facts are so much more useful than opinions. A focus on facts, logic, an= d rational thinking was a gift of the Enlightenment, now being lost. =0D =0D Fly safely!=0D =0D Fred =0D =0D =0D =0D =0D -------Original Message-------=0D =0D From: Lancair=0D Date: 4/01/2013 11:09:19 PM=0D To: lml@lancaironline.net=0D Subject: [LML] Re: stalls=0D =0D Fred,=0D =0D Never has the issue been more clearly stated. No personal axe to grind, just a clear description of the dragons we are flying.=0D =0D Robert M. Simon=0D Lancair ES-P N301ES=0D =0D =0D From: Frederick Moreno [mailto:frederickmoreno@bigpond.com]=0D Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2013 10:16 AM=0D To: lml@lancaironline.net=0D Subject: Re: [LML] Re: stalls=0D =0D Bob wrote:=0D =0D "Interesting: In all the twins I have flown not once was a stall an appro= ved procedure. Approach to stall sure, but never a full stall.=0D =0D . . .=0D =0D But deliberately putting the airplane into a deep stall is Russian Roulet= te. Many aircraft are like this. Why go there?=0D =0D Fred Moreno=0D =0D =0D =0D =0D =0D =0D ____________________________________________________________=0D =0D --=0D For archives and unsub http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.ht= ml=0D =0D =20 --------------Boundary-00=_06M4VW72QL8000000000 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Thanks Bob.
 
Facts are so much more useful than opinions.  A focus on f= acts, logic, and rational thinking was a gift of the  Enlighten= ment, now being lost.
 
Fly safely!
 
Fred 
 
 
 
 
-= ------Original Message-------
 
From: Lancair
Date: 4/01/2013 11= :09:19 PM
Subject: [LML] Re:= stalls
 
Fred,
 
Never has the issue been more clearly stated.  No personal= axe to grind, just a clear description  of the dragons we are = flying.
 
Robert M. Simon
Lancair ES-P N301ES
 
 
From: Frederick Moreno [mailto:frederickmoreno@bigpond.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2013 10:16 AM
Subject: Re: [LML] Re: stalls
 
  Bob wrote:
 
"Interesting: In all the twins I have flown not once was a stall an = approved procedure.  Approach to stall sure, but never a full s= tall.
 
  . . .
 
--------------Boundary-00=_06M4VW72QL8000000000--