X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2012 12:53:09 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from ch1outboundpool.messaging.microsoft.com ([216.32.181.181] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 6.0c1) with ESMTPS id 5724797 for lml@lancaironline.net; Wed, 22 Aug 2012 21:13:32 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=216.32.181.181; envelope-from=henry@cptgroup.com Received: from mail170-ch1-R.bigfish.com (10.43.68.245) by CH1EHSOBE010.bigfish.com (10.43.70.60) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.225.23; Thu, 23 Aug 2012 01:12:57 +0000 Received: from mail170-ch1 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail170-ch1-R.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69DF3380474 for ; Thu, 23 Aug 2012 01:12:57 +0000 (UTC) X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:157.56.240.213;KIP:(null);UIP:(null);IPV:NLI;H:BL2PRD0711HT002.namprd07.prod.outlook.com;RD:none;EFVD:NLI X-SpamScore: -6 X-BigFish: PS-6(zz9371I542Mzz1202hzz8275chz2fh2a8h668h839hd25hf0ah107ah) Received-SPF: pass (mail170-ch1: domain of cptgroup.com designates 157.56.240.213 as permitted sender) client-ip=157.56.240.213; envelope-from=henry@cptgroup.com; helo=BL2PRD0711HT002.namprd07.prod.outlook.com ;.outlook.com ; Received: from mail170-ch1 (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail170-ch1 (MessageSwitch) id 1345684375550230_4938; Thu, 23 Aug 2012 01:12:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from CH1EHSMHS024.bigfish.com (snatpool2.int.messaging.microsoft.com [10.43.68.232]) by mail170-ch1.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83D00340207 for ; Thu, 23 Aug 2012 01:12:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from BL2PRD0711HT002.namprd07.prod.outlook.com (157.56.240.213) by CH1EHSMHS024.bigfish.com (10.43.70.24) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.225.23; Thu, 23 Aug 2012 01:12:54 +0000 Received: from BL2PRD0711MB423.namprd07.prod.outlook.com ([169.254.12.79]) by BL2PRD0711HT002.namprd07.prod.outlook.com ([10.255.104.165]) with mapi id 14.16.0190.008; Thu, 23 Aug 2012 01:12:54 +0000 From: Henry Arjad X-Original-To: Lancair Mailing List Subject: RE: [LML] OP Technology Displays Thread-Topic: [LML] OP Technology Displays Thread-Index: AQHNgJOWHZ7uSoOeTUyxgm3Op0rsfpdmllSw Disposition-Notification-To: Henry Arjad X-Original-Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2012 01:12:53 +0000 X-Original-Message-ID: <558530A6DC7BEC45A373219ADBF87C6BF62C90@BL2PRD0711MB423.namprd07.prod.outlook.com> References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [209.80.5.75] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Original-Return-Path: henry@cptgroup.com X-OriginatorOrg: cptgroup.com Denis, You may want to check into the Dynon system. I'm extremely happy with mine= , especially with their new update. hardware cost less the $14k for a comp= lete dual 10 inch screen system. Add another $1k for their new soon to be = released ADSB and weather reporting module. =20 =A0 Henry Arjad=20 KSNA Legacy N22YY 67 hours and counting -----Original Message----- From: Lancair Mailing List [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of Deni= s Conkey Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2012 11:25 AM To: lml@lancaironline.net Subject: [LML] OP Technology Displays I'm inquiring as to who is operating OP Technology displays that might be a= ble to provide some insight into how they operate and issues they are havin= g. Would be very interested in speaking with any owners. =20 We are about to put them back into our panel after 3.5 years of rebuild tim= e on a Lancair IVPT. I've heard that the displays with the LCF are over ta= xing the power supply and eventually reboot or shut down. Not good. Since these displays are out of production and are not really being support= ed, I'm trying to ascertain if I'm chasing a lost cause in trying to get th= e company to do a retrofit which they have designed which will put in much = brighter and less power consuming LED lighting, but could cost us $3-5K to = have done and there is no continuing software updates from my understanding= . This may still be cheaper than new displays, but I'm really disappointed th= at the acquiring company (Aerosonic) appears to be wringing their hands in = terms of standing by this product which were over $20K per unit. Any help/thoughts appreciated. Denis Conkey N750PJ 805-402-6197 -- For archives and unsub http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.html