X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2012 08:08:48 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from sfa.gami.com ([68.89.254.162] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.4.4) with ESMTP id 5398486 for lml@lancaironline.net; Wed, 15 Feb 2012 10:52:00 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=68.89.254.162; envelope-from=gwbraly@gami.com Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by sfa.gami.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D4157B9 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2012 09:51:23 -0600 (CST) Received: from gamimail1.Gami.local (mail.gami.com [10.10.10.33]) by sfa.gami.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92D227CF for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2012 09:50:23 -0600 (CST) Received: from gamimail1.Gami.local ([10.10.12.14]) by gamimail1.Gami.local ([10.10.12.14]) with mapi; Wed, 15 Feb 2012 09:50:15 -0600 From: George Braly X-Original-To: Lancair Mailing List X-Original-Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 09:50:13 -0600 Subject: RE: [LML] Re: Tempest spark plugs Thread-Topic: [LML] Re: Tempest spark plugs Thread-Index: Aczr5UnHCbh18On/QS6XfJCxKQYLaAAE75fw X-Original-Message-ID: References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-2.3.2 (20050629) (Debian) at gami.com In a word - - yes. =20 The correct approach to selecting spark plugs is to always use the coldest = plug that does not result in an unacceptable level of deposits or fouling. If your 38 heat range plugs are clean in normal use, then moving to the n= ext colder plug is good practice. Watch them and check them for deposits. If they remain clean (likely if you normally run LOP) then consider moving= colder, again, at some point down the road.=20 -----Original Message----- From: Lancair Mailing List [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of Lorn= H Olsen Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2012 7:24 AM To: lml@lancaironline.net Subject: [LML] Re: Tempest spark plugs George, I have been using REM38S plugs for about 1,000 hours. My engine is an O-320= -D1F 8.5 compression, 160HP Lycoming. I run as lean as possible for a carbe= d engine. As far as I know, the 38 has been the standard recommended plug f= or this engine. Should I be considering cooler plugs? Lorn > From: George Braly > Date: February 14, 2012 7:51:26 AM EST >=20 > Colyn, let me respond. >=20 > a) So far, only the Champion fine wire plugs are showing a significant p= roblem with cracking of porcelain on the central electrode. >=20 > However, since the scrutiny started - - an unrelated collateral issue ha= s arisen from observation of the frequently encountered high resistance of = the internal RFI resistor. THAT issue is identical for both massive plugs= and fine wire plugs. That problem is not nearly as significant as the cr= acking insulator problem. >=20 > b) TAT has no evidence that the Tempest plugs have any issues of any kind= . Fine wire or massive. >=20 > c) We do prefer the 29 heat range plugs. If they were available we woul= d recommend 27 heat range plugs. The reality is that the only people that = need high heat range plugs are people who operate with rich mixtures - - t= o keep down plug deposits. With routine lean mixture operation there is so= far no discernable plug deposits on colder heat range plugs. I have per= sonally operated a set of experimental -27 heat range plugs for several hu= ndred hours. The plugs remained clean. In general, everyone should atte= mpt to identify and operate with the coldest heat range plugs that do not c= reate deposits or accumulate oil.=20 >=20 > d) I think this is covered above - - -=20 >=20 > Regards, George -- Lorn H. 'Feathers' Olsen, MAA, ASMEL, ASES, Comm, Inst DynaComm, Corp., 248-345-0500, mailto:lorn@dynacomm.us LNC2, FB90/92, O-320-D1F, 1,800 hrs, N31161, Y47, SE Michigan -- For archives and unsub http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.html