X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2012 08:02:36 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from nm4-vm0.bullet.mail.ac4.yahoo.com ([98.139.53.206] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.4.4) with SMTP id 5380275 for lml@lancaironline.net; Thu, 02 Feb 2012 12:21:27 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=98.139.53.206; envelope-from=n20087@yahoo.com Received: from [98.139.52.197] by nm4.bullet.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 02 Feb 2012 17:20:51 -0000 Received: from [98.139.52.178] by tm10.bullet.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 02 Feb 2012 17:20:51 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1061.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 02 Feb 2012 17:20:51 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 624651.46457.bm@omp1061.mail.ac4.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 56080 invoked from network); 2 Feb 2012 17:20:51 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=DKIM-Signature:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-SMTP:Received:Subject:References:From:Content-Type:X-Mailer:In-Reply-To:Message-Id:Date:To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Mime-Version; b=6SPtthNc4Xeh91Gw+ZXZ/UWnLVLWcGxv4y3eh83yZv3GH4G+BLHZnCOI8QjzeHnJ9fQD36eaICDXKzLH49iEWHi5/2we8Oiwy0c7HKpmgyOKo722zNGz/EyXe+51yUyx8OtAicYBNGHkrEaySW/S4V7KnMOS9VJ3cZcXl6THlY8= ; X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-YMail-OSG: VFNh7eMVM1kZ4VTqB1Jk_ZyYWIMDlG_b_KAlS34UMcmC_AP U5i28b.DLPV_K1zifX6.FKE5BSfHpVNPYhLAD73xeYQGcHxOTvBvc_oGa1rO wLPMfFEBwxjei26mq9nLTrWOJTaKxJtF57jC4vdp.Skb2KlYLUe0EUMBvOwL dQyAJAjneOVmfi17yR7L0bpchA33BryocVPM9s1N7bEF04VWp7QLi4iHK7zr NOSVk6rvNV2fuYDZtIVCKaHkHRXrMXw33HJuVHqV5wCQf9Uw4ZJRYpMvLGsk TUUgZUciInWSV3.7Z52jr4s7U3c2JxZ2UMWemc2ag_xm0gZjlkDEcvJPnUs3 ilCmCrec2iXFWLEgmZ_prmtYQGpY7FOVaAX2VpvE4I4QhRGYslmRICt08bKf Tug04.dtz7j7e8RzfdxFhv9d6UyfcIw-- X-Yahoo-SMTP: NQQt3c2swBAKSrExoA1eZuT7_w-- Received: from [10.234.108.102] (n20087@192.88.212.49 with xymcookie) by smtp122-mob.biz.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with SMTP; 02 Feb 2012 09:20:51 -0800 PST Subject: Re: [LML] Cabin heat References: From: N20087 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: iPad Mail (9A334) In-Reply-To: X-Original-Message-Id: <126E761A-AF0C-4A9E-8436-067F0CD93AEF@yahoo.com> X-Original-Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2012 12:20:50 -0500 X-Original-To: Lancair Mailing List Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Peter=20 I had the same concern with respect to wasting valuable head pressure in the= plenum. I compromised since I did not want to stress the exhaust. What I d= id was add some scat to the exit of the heater valve which was mounted at th= e lower end of the firewall. I chocked the scat into a duckbill which should= maintain back pressure but with enough of a gap (3/8 inch) to allow cooling= air to pass over the exhaust in the heat exchanger. I don't see any eviden= ce of significant heating on the exhaust down tube inside the exchanger or t= he cylinder head Thanks Tom Sent from my iPad On Feb 2, 2012, at 8:49 AM, Peter Sokolowski wrot= e: > I am routing my cabin heat hoses and the follwoing was braought to my atte= ntion. > =20 > Presently I take the pressured air from my plenum, than to the heat exchan= ger mounted on the exhaust and routing the heated air to the valve which I c= an open for cabin heat or close it. If I close it, the air gets blocked at t= he valve as I thought it is better to block it rather to dump the heated air= to the cowling. Reason for that is that I get the air from the plenum and d= umping it to the plenum reduces the available air to cool the engine and red= uces the pressure difference between the plenum and the cowling. > =20 > Now a friend mentioned that I might get a heat blocking at the heat exchan= ger with undefined consequences. So to say better dump the air to the cowlin= g rather than getting a cracked exhaust. > =20 > What is your experience / opinion ? > =20 > Thanks in advance, > =20 > Peter > D-EPSO, LNC 360 MKII (95%)