X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2012 07:34:55 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from nm30-vm0.access.bullet.mail.mud.yahoo.com ([66.94.237.86] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.4.3) with SMTP id 5374344 for lml@lancaironline.net; Thu, 02 Feb 2012 07:30:14 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=66.94.237.86; envelope-from=cwfmd@yahoo.com Received: from [66.94.237.198] by nm30.access.bullet.mail.mud.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 02 Feb 2012 12:29:38 -0000 Received: from [66.94.237.100] by tm9.access.bullet.mail.mud.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 02 Feb 2012 12:29:38 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1005.access.mail.mud.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 02 Feb 2012 12:29:38 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 935983.99671.bm@omp1005.access.mail.mud.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 61816 invoked by uid 60001); 2 Feb 2012 12:29:38 -0000 DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Message-ID:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=ZQX0QkITBETR4CTSVT77wihAgpDHYLoPXYZKSabESntui41L3vX3DhVGgXxnuyrb2honNuZadSxjI8ls30+4pTgYqk5IGSDnM3SUh+0iUeXhc92sFvexm773GzGYyVS/iabL1cThMSfSNq6RNgpA/sDvlj8lu2cEkAhM/QUWYgs=; X-YMail-OSG: I3SrHdEVM1my0tEov.aNUUx75q9MzVNOT_0.paGFlXLf_lP RPgxJrDmEQES3NxCHwxdLo.O0b65e4camuN.kzoiuDysdIRVSSUmMK7ykLnB vIh.hItexYQD83byahZp6Z1JXKs9.0CdZqp7dBQyaUqYz93tZQ6RbVR0lkPq P3tWyp5QyWV_ieA1t0ftjRieqiKhSaEX7L07_Y_sxk0Efk7r48Je1n43LgZG cSOyDoYEK3cDAR98rNybhSsvBN39fp_ztxLCw8ujJCQYXwIzh9ybuEk_RIpq kjcJMuaf_venAgK66dWaYfF7aAamg7HhbmHzqsW_Tw7c19shajZYHARh5pUe L3LZXlKbcfGQVUmeDDf_IQKFQ__YsxNnCfqFDniE.2Pj3J1PR1vQAZaIDy4y .BBIcRMyiXuw7rZ4jEsxrHdyEJsCKEBiU02YQxXU807LurSvl73Pbuns- Received: from [199.30.160.189] by web81202.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 02 Feb 2012 04:29:38 PST X-Mailer: YahooMailClassic/15.0.4 YahooMailWebService/0.8.116.331537 X-Original-Message-ID: <1328185778.61761.YahooMailClassic@web81202.mail.mud.yahoo.com> X-Original-Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2012 04:29:38 -0800 (PST) From: cwfmd@yahoo.com Subject: RE: LML IV-P Door X-Original-To: Lancair Mailing MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="-2065151322-1182224492-1328185778=:61761" ---2065151322-1182224492-1328185778=:61761 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Would=A0the IV-P door open in flight, if unlocked from a latched, initial c= ondition?. With ground tests only, here in the hangar, it seems like Bernou= lli's forces,=A0pulling outward=A0against the large surface area of the doo= r,=A0against the=A0latch, would cause the lower hooks to remain engaged, ev= en after the handle is fully open.. On the ground,=A0try (pushing or)=A0pul= ling outward on the door to simulate this=A0negative pressure(inflight). It= seems like the lower=A0latch hooks=A0could jam and interfere with a bail o= ut attempt. This seems to be the result. if you go from fully latched, to u= nlocking the handles. I wonder if the incidents mentioned might have happen= ed from a completely unlatched condition on takeoff? This is also more like= ly scenario, to strike the right flap? =A0A concise description of such an=A0inflight experience, and your observa= tions of the sequence,=A0would be very useful. Do vibrations or oscillation= s cause the door to separate? Was there=A0some other=A0structural failure o= f the door, causing it to open? When did it happen in the sequence of event= s? =A0It would be important guidance,=A0in designing or considering=A0bailo= ut systems or egress methods, inflight. Thanks Bill Miller =A0 From:=20 "Jeff Edwards" To:=20 lml@lancaironline.net If it hits the tail you will probably lose the aircraft. AvSafe=A0Jeff Edwards ---2065151322-1182224492-1328185778=:61761 Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Would the IV-P door o= pen in flight, if unlocked from a latched, initial condition?. With ground = tests only, here in the hangar, it seems like Bernoulli's forces, pull= ing outward against the large surface area of the door, against t= he latch, would cause the lower hooks to remain engaged, even after th= e handle is fully open.. On the ground, try (pushing or) pulling = outward on the door to simulate this negative pressure(inflight). It s= eems like the lower latch hooks could jam and interfere with a ba= il out attempt. This seems to be the result. if you go from fully latched, = to unlocking the handles. I wonder if the incidents mentioned might have ha= ppened from a completely unlatched condition on takeoff? This is also more = likely scenario, to strike the right flap?
 A concise description of such an inflight exp= erience, and your observations of the sequence, would be very useful. = Do vibrations or oscillations cause the door to separate? Was there so= me other structural failure of the door, causing it to open? When did = it happen in the sequence of events?  It would be important guidance,&= nbsp;in designing or considering bailout systems or egress methods, in= flight.
Thanks
Bill Miller
 
From:
"Jeff Edwards" <vtailjeff@aol.com= >
To:
lml@lancaironline.net
If it hits the tail you will pr= obably lose the aircraft.

AvSafe 
Jeff Edwards
---2065151322-1182224492-1328185778=:61761--