Return-Path: Received: from portal.udlp.com ([207.109.1.80]) by ns1.olsusa.com (Post.Office MTA v3.5.3 release 223 ID# 0-64832U3500L350S0V35) with ESMTP id com for ; Wed, 19 Jul 2000 15:48:49 -0400 Received: from portal.udlp.com (root@localhost) by portal.udlp.com with ESMTP id OAA22947 for ; Wed, 19 Jul 2000 14:55:06 -0500 (CDT) Received: from ccmail.udlp.com ([10.1.6.254]) by portal.udlp.com with ESMTP id OAA22936 for ; Wed, 19 Jul 2000 14:55:05 -0500 (CDT) Received: from ccMail by ccmail.udlp.com (IMA Internet Exchange 3.14) id 00206827; Wed, 19 Jul 2000 14:51:26 -0500 From: CHRISTOPHER_ZAVATSON@udlp.com Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2000 12:15:10 -0500 Message-ID: <00206827.C21254@udlp.com> Subject: fuel flow sensors To: Lancair.list@olsusa.com X-Mailing-List: lancair.list@olsusa.com Reply-To: lancair.list@olsusa.com Mime-Version: 1.0 <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> << Lancair Builders' Mail List >> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> I would like to add fuel flow to the instrument panel. I am currently looking at the JPI FS450, but the brand is not relevant to my dilemma. The JPI unit, as well as other brands, use Flowscan 201 and 231 transducers depending on whether the system is gravity fed or pump driven. When I asked for a technical reason for having different transducers I couldn't get a satisfactory answer from either Pacific Coast Avionics or JPI. Each will quote one transducer for high wing applications and the other for low wing, but neither can tell me why. Mass flow is mass flow. My O-360 will use the same fuel regardless of where the wing is located. The only theory I can come up with at this point is that the gravity fed unit has a lower pressure drop in order to not rob too much of the limited pressure head in a high wing aircraft (I imagine this comes with a penalty in accuracy). In a pump driven system, especially and injected system loosing a psi is probably not a big deal assuming the transducer is mounted after the pump. According to JPI (verbal) the transducer can be installed anywhere in the fuel line which includes before any pumps. My concern is that added restriction before a pump encourages vapor lock by lowering the pressure between the restriction(transducer) and the pump inlet. I have a feeling the flow transducer intended for pump driven engines has a loss on the order of 1 psi. This is based on a report I found by a Rebel owner that did a flow test with and without the 201 transducer. The results were 24 gpm without and 12 gpm with the transducer. Do any of you have experience with these units. I am curious how many installations may be out there with transducers installed before any fuel pumps and if anyone has any technical data for these units. Chris Zavatson N91CZ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LML website: http://www.olsusa.com/Users/Mkaye/maillist.html LML Builders' Bookstore: http://www.buildersbooks.com/lancair Please send your photos and drawings to marvkaye@olsusa.com. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>