Return-Path: Received: from imo-d04.mx.aol.com ([205.188.157.36]) by ns1.olsusa.com (Post.Office MTA v3.5.3 release 223 ID# 0-64832U3500L350S0V35) with ESMTP id com for ; Tue, 18 Jul 2000 00:05:53 -0400 Received: from RWolf99@aol.com by imo-d04.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v27.12.) id k.5f.8107563 (17084) for ; Tue, 18 Jul 2000 00:12:07 -0400 (EDT) From: RWolf99@aol.com Message-ID: <5f.8107563.26a53317@aol.com> Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2000 00:12:07 EDT Subject: Re: Aluminum Washers To: lancair.list@olsusa.com X-Mailing-List: lancair.list@olsusa.com Reply-To: lancair.list@olsusa.com Mime-Version: 1.0 <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> << Lancair Builders' Mail List >> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> In a message dated 7/15/0 9:45:59 PM, Brent Regan wrote: <> Mea culpa, I made the posting. Everything Brent says in his response seems right on the mark to me. The washers to which I was referring are between the engine mount pads and the firewall. They are spacers to replace Fiberfrax that would otherwise be crushed. I don't I see a problem here, as the aluminum washers are fully shadowed by the large pads on the engine mount. This would most assuredly NOT be the case for the washers on the cockpit side of the firewall, which are only covered by the bolt heads, and the washers are subjected to bending loads in an "oil can" manner. In fact, those washers are visibly deformed (slightly) when torqued to spec -- there's no way I'd replace those with aluminum ones. Sorry for the confusion, and thanks to Brent for correcting my statement. - Rob Wolf >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LML website: http://www.olsusa.com/Users/Mkaye/maillist.html LML Builders' Bookstore: http://www.buildersbooks.com/lancair Please send your photos and drawings to marvkaye@olsusa.com. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>