X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2011 07:49:49 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from mail-ew0-f52.google.com ([209.85.215.52] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.4.0) with ESMTPS id 5051191 for lml@lancaironline.net; Wed, 13 Jul 2011 23:35:01 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.85.215.52; envelope-from=doberme@gmail.com Received: by ewy28 with SMTP id 28so2303835ewy.25 for ; Wed, 13 Jul 2011 20:34:26 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.213.98.202 with SMTP id r10mr592565ebn.86.1310614466824; Wed, 13 Jul 2011 20:34:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.213.112.203 with HTTP; Wed, 13 Jul 2011 20:34:26 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: X-Original-Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2011 22:34:26 -0500 X-Original-Message-ID: Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Lancair 235 From: Marvin Doberenz X-Original-To: Lancair Mailing List Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00504502d237bb8a9f04a7ff35ae --00504502d237bb8a9f04a7ff35ae Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 I replaced the IVO 3 blade, 70" prop that was on my 320 at purchase with a 2 blade, 70" Catto prop. Got an increase in top speed and an increase in static rpm! Of course, I don't think the IVO was a good choice and you can't expect that type of improvement in general. But I'm very pleased with the prop. And Craig did a good job on the paint, as well! Marvin Doberenz LNC 320 On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 11:23 AM, Gary Edwards wrote: > ** > The next prop for my 235/320 will be a 66" 2-blade Catto. I'm impressed > with their products. I believe their props are more efficient than my > current 64" Props Inc. unit. > > Gary > LNc2 > > ----- Original Message ----- > *From:* Jim Guldi > *To:* lml@lancaironline.net > *Sent:* Wednesday, July 13, 2011 5:19 AM > *Subject:* [LML] Lacair 235 > > I have a Lancair 235 with an 0-235 and had an MTprop that got damaged and I > need a replacement. I am thinking of a experimental wood prop so what do any > of you suggest and does anyone have one for sale? Contact me at > guldi.jim@gmail.com thanks > > > ..jim guldi CFI > > > > --00504502d237bb8a9f04a7ff35ae Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I replaced the IVO 3 blade, 70" prop that was on my 320 at purchase wi= th a 2 blade, 70" Catto prop. =A0Got an increase in top speed and an i= ncrease in static rpm! =A0Of course, I don't think the IVO was a good c= hoice and you can't expect that type of improvement in general. =A0But = I'm very pleased with the prop. =A0And Craig did a good job on the pain= t, as well!

Marvin Doberenz
LNC 320

On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 11:23 AM, Gary Edwards &l= t;gary21sn@hotmail.com> wrote:
The next prop for my 235/320 will be a 66" 2-blade Catto.=A0 I= 9;m=20 impressed with their products.=A0 I believe their props are more efficient= =20 than my current 64" Props Inc. unit.
=A0
Gary
LNc2=A0
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, July 13, 2011 5:19= =20 AM
Subject: [LML] Lacair 235

I have a Lancair 235 with an 0-235 and had an MTprop that = got=20 damaged and I need a replacement. I am thinking of a experimental wood pr= op so=20 what do any of you suggest and does anyone have one for sale? Contact me= =20 at=A0 guldi.jim@gmail.com thanks=20


..jim guldi CFI




--00504502d237bb8a9f04a7ff35ae--